Comparative Study
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparative study of three different catheters for CT imaging-bronchoscopy-guided radiofrequency ablation as a potential and novel interventional therapy for lung cancer.

Chest 2010 April
BACKGROUND: We previously reported that bronchoscopy-guided, internally cooled radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in normal sheep lung was a safe, effective, and feasible procedure without major complications.

PURPOSES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and feasible conditions of bronchoscopy-guided, internally cooled RFA as a clinical application for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS: Ten patients pathologically diagnosed with NSCLC and the clinical stage of T1N0M0 were enrolled in the study. Three types of internally cooled electrode catheter tips were prepared using different procedure conditions involving ablation time: an internally cooled electrode with a 5-mm cylindrical active tip at a power output of 20 W, flow rate of 50 mL/min, and an ablation time of 30 s (n = 3), an electrode with an 8-mm active tip with four beads at 20 W, 50 mL/min, and 40 s (n = 3), and an electrode with a 10-mm active tip with five beads at 20 W, 50 mL/min, and 50 s (n = 4). CT image-guided, bronchoscopy-guided, internally cooled RFA was performed, and the patients underwent standard lung resection therapy. The resected lung tissue was examined histopathologically to assess the ablated areas.

RESULTS: Ablated areas pathologically evaluated with the 10-mm active tip were significantly larger than those with the 5-mm tip. Thus, the ablated areas were enlarged depending on the tip length and prolonged ablation time. There were no complications during RFA, such as bronchial bleeding or pneumothorax.

CONCLUSIONS: CT imaging-bronchoscopy-guided, internally cooled RFA in humans is a safe and feasible procedure that could become a potential therapeutic tool for local control in medically inoperable patients with stage I NSCLC.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app