Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Molecular studies of DO alleles reveal that JO is more prevalent than HY in Brazil, whereas HY is more prevalent in New York.

Because of the scarcity of anti-Hy and anti-Jo(a), hemagglutination typing for the Dombrock blood group system antigens, Hy and Jo(a), is not feasible. The molecular bases associated with these antigens have been determined, making it possible to distinguish HY and JO from wild-type DO. This provides a tool to predict the probable phenotype of patients and to screen for antigen-negative donors. PCR-RFLP assays and a microchip assay were used to determine the frequency of HY and JO alleles in donors from Brazil and New York. DNA from random Brazilian donors, 288 by PCR-RFLP and 599 by the bead array method (BeadChip, BioArray Solutions, Warren, NJ), was tested to determine 323G/T (HY+/HY-) and 350C>T (JO+/JO-) single-nucleotide polymorphisms. In New York, 27,226 donors who self-identified as being African American were tested by hemagglutination with anti-Gy(a). Nonreactive and weakly reactive samples were tested by PCR-RFLP for the same alleles as listed above. In Brazil, 30 (3.4%) of the samples were JO/DO and 13 (1.4%) were HY/DO. In New York, of the samples that had HY or JO alleles, 14 were homozygous HY/HY 132 were heterozygous HY/DO, 13 were heterozygous HY/JO, 14 were heterozygous JO/DO, and 3 were homozygous JO/JO. These results show that in donors from Brazil, JO (30 alleles) is more than twice as prevalent as HY (13 alleles), whereas in donors from New York, HY (173 alleles) was more than five times more common than JO (33 alleles).

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app