COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Racial disparity in the clinical determinants and outcomes of cesarean hysterectomy.

This study was undertaken to compare the risk factors, indications for and complications rates of cesarean hysterectomy in patient from two different ethnic backgrounds-whites and nonwhites-using patients who had cesarean hysterectomy in the Detroit Medical Center from 1991-2007. During the study period, there were 42599 cesarean deliveries, making the incidence of cesarean hysterectomy to be 3.7 per 1000 cesarean deliveries. Of the 158 cases, 8.9% were planned, while 91.1% were emergent. Among the emergent cases, nonwhites were more likely to have a higher parity (median [range], 3 [0-13] vs. 2 [0-9]; p = .025), while whites were more likely to have a private insurance (64.7% vs. 29.1%; p = .001; OR, 4.47; 95% CI, 1.98-10.09]. There were no significant differences in the indications for cesarean hysterectomy among the racial groups. Whites were more likely to have composite cardiopulmonary complications and urological injury compared to nonwhites, (17.6% vs. 3.6%; P = .012; OR, 5.68; 95% CI, 1.50-21.51) and (26.5% vs. 10.9%; P = .05; OR 2.94; CI, 1.12-7.75), respectively. In conclusion, beyond higher rates of cardiopulmonary complications and urological injury among whites, no significant racial differences exist in the risk factors, indications for, and complications from cesarean hysterectomy.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app