Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Prevalence and functional effect of arteriovenous fistula calcifications, evaluated by spiral CT in chronic haemodialysis patients].

INTRODUCTION: Vascular calcification is a common finding in patients (pts) with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the prevalence and functional effect of native arteriovenous fistula AVF (feeding artery and/or arterialized vein) calcifications evaluated by spiral computed tomography (CT) in ESRD pts undergoing chronic hemodialysis (HD).

PATIENTS AND METHOD: Forty-five upper limb AVF (radial 44.4% or brachial 55.6%, mean duration 65.3 +/- 80.9 months) without evidence of significant stenosis were evaluated by CT in 45 ESRD pts (mean age 63.8 +/- 13.1 yr; sex M: 71.1%, F: 28.9%; mean time on HD 53.1 +/- 51.9 months; diabetic nephropathy 15.6%). All AVF explorations were performed using the same multi-slice spiral CT scanner (HiSpeed Dual machine, GE Medical Systems). The severity of AVF calcifications was quantified by CT using the following criteria: grade I absence of calcifications, grade II isolated calcifications (<10 groups of calcification), grade III moderate calcifications (10-20 groups of calcification) and grade IV diffuse calcifications (>20 groups of calcification). Laboratory parameters analyzed: calcium, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone; calcium x phosphorus product was calculated. The same week of CT scanning, we evaluated AVF function measuring the blood flow rate (QA). We determined QA (1559.3 +/- 980.6 ml/min) by the Delta-H method (ABF-mode, HemaMetrics, USA) using the Crit-Line III monitor (68.9%) or by Doppler ultrasound (31.1%) performed by the same radiologist using a 5-8 MHz linear transducer (Sequoia machine, Siemens-Acuson); mean arterial pressure MAP (94.7 +/- 16.3 mmHg) was recorded simultaneous with QA.

RESULTS: Most pts not showed AVF calcification by CT scan (grade I: 27/45, 60%). Forty percent of pts (18/45) demonstrated any degree of AVF calcification (grade II 13.3%, grade III 8.9%, grade IV 17.8%). Pts with brachial AVF showed higher mean QA compared to pts with radial AVF (1899.1 +/- 1131.8 versus 1134.5 +/- 516.4 ml/min, p=0.005), but MAP (91.2 +/- 15.8 versus 99.0 +/- 16.2 mmHg) and the prevalence of AVF calcification (32% versus 50%) were not different between both groups (p=0.11 and p=0.24, respectively). Pts with evidence of any calcification on CT scanning (grade II, III or IV) had higher time on HD (84.6 +/- 63.1 versus 24.6 +/- 20.0 months), higher AVF duration (97.7 +/- 89.3 versus 34.6 +/- 61.2 months) and similar QA (1488.3 +/- 678.9 versus 1606.6 +/- 1148.9 ml/min) compared with pts without AVF calcification (p=0.014, p=0.001 and p=0.69, respectively); no differences in MAP (95.4 +/- 13.8 versus 94.2 +/- 17.9 mmHg), prevalence of brachial AVF (44% versus 63%) or mineral metabolism parameters were found when comparing both groups (for all comparisons, p=NS). The same results were obtained when comparing pts with a high (grade III-IV: 26.7%) and a low (grade I-II: 73.3%) AVF calcification score, or when comparing pts with diffuse (grade IV) and without (grade I) AVF calcification.

CONCLUSIONS: 1) The prevalence of AVF calcification by CT scan was 40%. 2) The AVF calcification was related with time on HD and AVF duration. 3) The function of fully developed AVF without stenosis and suitable for routine HD was not impaired by the presence of calcifications.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app