We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
META-ANALYSIS
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
REVIEW
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Can the Ottawa knee rule be applied to children? A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ 2009 April
BACKGROUND: The Ottawa knee rule (OKR), a clinical decision aid is used to reduce unnecessary radiography. It is not clear whether this rule can be applied to children.
OBJECTIVE: To establish whether the OKR had adequate sensitivity and acceptable specificity in children to advocate widespread use.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of observational studies that examined the diagnostic characteristics of the OKR in children.
DATA SOURCES: Relevant English language articles were identified from Medline (1950 to date), EMBASE (1974 to date), CINAHL (1982 to date), the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and a hand search of bibliographies.
STUDY SELECTION: Observational studies that included children and have used the OKR for ruling out fractures in children either radiologically or in combination with follow-up.
RESULTS: Four relevant studies were identified. Three studies were suitable for inclusion in the meta-analysis, representing 1130 children. The pooled negative likelihood ratio was 0.07 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.29), the pooled positive likelihood ratio was 1.94 (95% CI 1.60 to 2.36), the pooled sensitivity was 99% (CI 94.4 to 99.8) and the pooled specificity was 46% (CI 43.0 to 49.1). The reduction in radiography was between 30% and 40%.
CONCLUSION: The OKR has high sensitivity and adequate specificity for children over the age of 5 years. There are not enough good data to advocate application of the OKR in children less than 5 years.
OBJECTIVE: To establish whether the OKR had adequate sensitivity and acceptable specificity in children to advocate widespread use.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of observational studies that examined the diagnostic characteristics of the OKR in children.
DATA SOURCES: Relevant English language articles were identified from Medline (1950 to date), EMBASE (1974 to date), CINAHL (1982 to date), the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and a hand search of bibliographies.
STUDY SELECTION: Observational studies that included children and have used the OKR for ruling out fractures in children either radiologically or in combination with follow-up.
RESULTS: Four relevant studies were identified. Three studies were suitable for inclusion in the meta-analysis, representing 1130 children. The pooled negative likelihood ratio was 0.07 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.29), the pooled positive likelihood ratio was 1.94 (95% CI 1.60 to 2.36), the pooled sensitivity was 99% (CI 94.4 to 99.8) and the pooled specificity was 46% (CI 43.0 to 49.1). The reduction in radiography was between 30% and 40%.
CONCLUSION: The OKR has high sensitivity and adequate specificity for children over the age of 5 years. There are not enough good data to advocate application of the OKR in children less than 5 years.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app