We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL, PHASE I
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Myocardial Assistance by Grafting a New Bioartificial Upgraded Myocardium (MAGNUM trial): clinical feasibility study.
Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2008 March
BACKGROUND: Cell transplantation for the regeneration of ischemic myocardium is limited by poor graft viability and low cell retention. In ischemic cardiomyopathy, the extracellular matrix is deeply altered; therefore, it could be important to associate a procedure aiming at regenerating myocardial cells and restoring the extracellular matrix function. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of intrainfarct cell therapy associated with a cell-seeded collagen scaffold grafted onto infarcted ventricles.
METHODS: In 20 consecutive patients presenting with left ventricular postischemic myocardial scars and indication for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, bone marrow cells were implanted during surgery. In the last 10 patients, we added a collagen matrix seeded with bone marrow cells, placed onto the scar.
RESULTS: There was no mortality and any related adverse events (follow-up 10 +/- 3.5 months). New York Heart Association functional class improved in both groups from 2.3 +/- 0.5 to 1.3 +/- 0.5 (matrix, p = 0.0002) versus 2.4 +/- 0.5 to 1.5 +/- 0.5 (no matrix, p = 0.001). Left ventricular end-diastolic volume evolved from 142.4 +/- 24.5 mL to 112.9 +/- 27.3 mL (matrix, p = 0.02) versus 138.9 +/- 36.1 mL to 148.7 +/- 41 mL (no matrix, p = 0.57), left ventricular filling deceleration time improved significantly in the matrix group from 162 +/- 7 ms to 198 +/- 9 ms (p = 0.01) versus the no-matrix group (from 159 +/- 5 ms to 167 +/- 8 ms, p = 0.07). Scar area thickness progressed from 6 +/- 1.4 to 9 mm +/- 1.1 mm (matrix, p = 0.005) versus 5 +/- 1.5 mm to 6 +/- 0.8 mm (no matrix, p = 0.09). Ejection fraction improved in both groups, from 25.3% +/- 7.3% to 32% +/- 5.4% (matrix, p = 0.03) versus 27.2% +/- 6.9% to 34.6% +/- 7.3% (no matrix, p = 0.031).
CONCLUSIONS: This tissue-engineered approach is feasible and safe and appears to improve the efficiency of cellular cardiomyoplasty. The cell-seeded collagen matrix increases the thickness of the infarct scar with viable tissue and helps to normalize cardiac wall stress in injured regions, thus limiting ventricular remodeling and improving diastolic function.
METHODS: In 20 consecutive patients presenting with left ventricular postischemic myocardial scars and indication for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, bone marrow cells were implanted during surgery. In the last 10 patients, we added a collagen matrix seeded with bone marrow cells, placed onto the scar.
RESULTS: There was no mortality and any related adverse events (follow-up 10 +/- 3.5 months). New York Heart Association functional class improved in both groups from 2.3 +/- 0.5 to 1.3 +/- 0.5 (matrix, p = 0.0002) versus 2.4 +/- 0.5 to 1.5 +/- 0.5 (no matrix, p = 0.001). Left ventricular end-diastolic volume evolved from 142.4 +/- 24.5 mL to 112.9 +/- 27.3 mL (matrix, p = 0.02) versus 138.9 +/- 36.1 mL to 148.7 +/- 41 mL (no matrix, p = 0.57), left ventricular filling deceleration time improved significantly in the matrix group from 162 +/- 7 ms to 198 +/- 9 ms (p = 0.01) versus the no-matrix group (from 159 +/- 5 ms to 167 +/- 8 ms, p = 0.07). Scar area thickness progressed from 6 +/- 1.4 to 9 mm +/- 1.1 mm (matrix, p = 0.005) versus 5 +/- 1.5 mm to 6 +/- 0.8 mm (no matrix, p = 0.09). Ejection fraction improved in both groups, from 25.3% +/- 7.3% to 32% +/- 5.4% (matrix, p = 0.03) versus 27.2% +/- 6.9% to 34.6% +/- 7.3% (no matrix, p = 0.031).
CONCLUSIONS: This tissue-engineered approach is feasible and safe and appears to improve the efficiency of cellular cardiomyoplasty. The cell-seeded collagen matrix increases the thickness of the infarct scar with viable tissue and helps to normalize cardiac wall stress in injured regions, thus limiting ventricular remodeling and improving diastolic function.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app