We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Residents' awareness and behaviour regarding typhoon evacuation advice in Hyogo Prefecture, Japan.
International Nursing Review 2008 March
BACKGROUND: When residents are confronted with disaster, it is often difficult for them to realize the danger and take protective action. In 2004, an evacuation advisory alert was issued on the approach of the season's 23rd typhoon in Japan, but only 5.1% of the residents actually evacuated. Therefore, we felt it necessary to elucidate the awareness and behaviours of residents during the period.
AIMS: To clarify the awareness, behaviour and related factors of residents who were issued an evacuation advisory alert for the 2004 season's 23rd typhoon.
METHODS: One questionnaire per one household was distributed to 2818 households in the area where the evacuation advisory alert was issued.
FINDINGS: A total of 481 responses were returned (a response rate of 17.1%). Residents who evacuated made their decision because they felt the situation was dangerous; they recognized the extent of the danger. There was a pattern of agreement that it had been wise to do so. For those who didn't evacuate, many cited as the reason for their behaviour that their houses didn't flood. Non-evacuees also felt it was all right to stay at home and valued the merits of staying home. Related factors were housing structures, routine disaster-preparedness, a sense of personal danger and the impact of mass media news.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the participation rate was only 17.1%, this study was successful in uncovering aspects of awareness and behaviour of residents in the designated area. It also provided insight into what is needed for future disaster-preparedness, equipment and education.
AIMS: To clarify the awareness, behaviour and related factors of residents who were issued an evacuation advisory alert for the 2004 season's 23rd typhoon.
METHODS: One questionnaire per one household was distributed to 2818 households in the area where the evacuation advisory alert was issued.
FINDINGS: A total of 481 responses were returned (a response rate of 17.1%). Residents who evacuated made their decision because they felt the situation was dangerous; they recognized the extent of the danger. There was a pattern of agreement that it had been wise to do so. For those who didn't evacuate, many cited as the reason for their behaviour that their houses didn't flood. Non-evacuees also felt it was all right to stay at home and valued the merits of staying home. Related factors were housing structures, routine disaster-preparedness, a sense of personal danger and the impact of mass media news.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the participation rate was only 17.1%, this study was successful in uncovering aspects of awareness and behaviour of residents in the designated area. It also provided insight into what is needed for future disaster-preparedness, equipment and education.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app