Case Reports
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Class II malocclusion therapy using fixed orthodontic appliance].

BACKGROUND: Depending on the indication, and the age of a patient, class II division I malocclusion can be treated by a fixed or mobile orthodontic appliance, with or without teeth extraction.

CASE REPORT: A treatment of a male patient, 15 years old, with dentoalveolar class II division I was described. On the base of clinical findings, study case analysis, analysis of orthopan and profile cephalogram, there were class II division I with protrusion of frontal teeth and mild crowding in lower jaw assesed. The patient was treated by fixed orthodontics appliances (SWA Roth .022") in both jaws for 18 months, with the retention period of the same length.

CONCLUSION: Fixed ortodontic appliances are necessary when bodily movement of the teeth is indicated--in this case for cuspids distalization and retraction of incisors.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app