Cost-effectiveness model of topical treatment of mild to moderate psoriasis vulgaris in Germany. A comparison of calcipotriol/betamethasone (Daivobet/Dovobet/Taclonex) once daily and a morning/evening non-fix combination of calcipotriol and betamethasone.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis vulgaris requires lifelong treatment associated with considerable health cost. Studies showed that a combination of a steroid and a vitamin D(3) analogue is more effective than both compounds in monotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of a fix calcipotriol/betamethasone combination (Daivobet/Dovobet/Taclonex) compared to a morning/evening non-fix calcipotriol/betamethasone combination in psoriasis treatment.

METHODS: A Markov model (discrete-time stochastic process based on transitions between health states) with 2 treatment arms (Daivobet/Dovobet/Taclonex vs. non-fix calcipotriol/betamethasone) over a 48-week time period was developed. The effectiveness criterion was the number of days with clearance or marked improvement. Clinical and health resource utilisation data were derived from randomised studies.

RESULTS: Treatment with Daivobet/Dovobet/Taclonex showed a higher cost-effectiveness compared to the non-fix combination, even when assuming a maximum compliance for the twice daily non-fix combination and varying the effectiveness of Daivobet/Dovobet/Taclonex by 10%.

CONCLUSION: Psoriasis treatment with a fix calcipotriol/betamethasone combination is more cost-effective than a non-fix morning/evening combination.