JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Patterns, effects, and thoracic volume changes of thoracoscopic pleurodesis in rabbits.

BACKGROUND: The ideal thoracoscopic pleurodesis method for preventing recurrence of spontaneous pneumothorax remains controversial. This study was conducted to compare the patterns, effects, and thoracic volume changes achieved using a variety of thoracoscopic procedures in rabbits.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six New Zealand White rabbits were randomly assigned to undergo the following thoracoscopic procedures in the left hemithorax: (a) parietal pleural abrasion; (b) minocycline instillation; (c) combination of abrasion and minocycline; or (d) examination alone. The rabbits were euthanatized 30 days after the operation to determine pleurodesis score, area of greatest adhesion, thoracic volume change, and histopathological findings.

RESULTS: Grossly, pleural abrasion produced moderate localized apical pleural symphysis with no obvious thoracic volume change. Minocycline instillation induced moderate generalized pleurodesis with a significant decrease in thoracic volume. The combination of abrasion and minocycline instillation produced the greatest generalized pleurodesis as well as a significant decrease in thoracic volume. On microscopic examination, the combination procedure produced the greatest inflammation and fibrosis of the visceral and parietal pleura. Increased intensity of pleurodesis score as well as pleural inflammation and fibrosis is associated with decreased thoracic volume.

CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic pleurodesis achieved using pleural abrasion and minocycline instillation induced different patterns of pleurodesis, and a combination of each method generated a synergy and produced a better pleurodesis. However, as the generalization and intensity of the pleurodesis were inversely associated with thoracic volume, the optimal method should be determined on an individual basis according to the clinical situation.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app