We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Conversion of post-systolic wall thickening into ejectional thickening by selective heart rate reduction during myocardial stunning.
European Heart Journal 2007 April
AIMS: Post-systolic wall thickening (PSWT) occurs after aortic valve closure. This waste of thickening does not participate in ejection. PSWT increases with myocardial ischaemia and stunning but the effects of anti-anginal drugs on PSWT during myocardial dysfunction remain unknown. The effects of two heart rate reducing agents, i.e. the beta-blocker atenolol and the selective I(f) current inhibitor ivabradine, were compared on PSWT.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Coronary stenosis was calibrated in six conscious instrumented dogs to suppress increase in coronary blood flow during a 10 min treadmill exercise to induce myocardial stunning. After exercise completion, stenosis was relieved and saline, atenolol or ivabradine (both at 1 mg/kg iv) were administered. For similar heart rate reduction, ivabradine attenuated stunning, whereas atenolol further depressed systolic wall thickening. PSWT to total wall thickening ratio was significantly decreased by ivabradine vs. saline, whereas total wall thickening was similar. Thus, ivabradine devoted a greater part of thickening to systole by converting PSWT into ejectional thickening. In contrast, atenolol failed to reduce PSWT vs. saline. Atrial pacing abolished the effects of ivabradine but not those of atenolol.
CONCLUSION: Selective heart rate reduction with ivabradine converts PSWT into ejectional thickening but not with atenolol secondary to its negative inotropism.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Coronary stenosis was calibrated in six conscious instrumented dogs to suppress increase in coronary blood flow during a 10 min treadmill exercise to induce myocardial stunning. After exercise completion, stenosis was relieved and saline, atenolol or ivabradine (both at 1 mg/kg iv) were administered. For similar heart rate reduction, ivabradine attenuated stunning, whereas atenolol further depressed systolic wall thickening. PSWT to total wall thickening ratio was significantly decreased by ivabradine vs. saline, whereas total wall thickening was similar. Thus, ivabradine devoted a greater part of thickening to systole by converting PSWT into ejectional thickening. In contrast, atenolol failed to reduce PSWT vs. saline. Atrial pacing abolished the effects of ivabradine but not those of atenolol.
CONCLUSION: Selective heart rate reduction with ivabradine converts PSWT into ejectional thickening but not with atenolol secondary to its negative inotropism.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app