[Prognostic and therapeutic implication of residual tumorous tissue in cervix conizate].

BACKGROUND/AIM: Conization is an excisive technique used for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. If conizate margines do not show any pathologic changes (negative findings) it is also the only therapeutic measure which should be applied. In case of conizate margins affected by the disease (positive findings), it is necessary not only to assess various parameters but also to decide on a further therapeutic approach. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of positive findings and its impact on a further optimal therapeutic approach choice.

METHODS: The data for analyses were retrospectively acquired through an insight into the medical records of the female patients who had undergone conization in the Institute for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center of Serbia, within a period from 1995 to 2000. Histopathologic analyses of the bioptic and cervical conizate and reconizate samples were performed in the same institute. The acquired data were analyzed and statistically processed.

RESULTS: Within the above mentioned period, a total of 823 conizations were done. In 76 patients, positive findings were determined. The acquired data analysis revealed positive findings decrease during this period, yet with no statistical significance. Higher statistically significant incidence of positive findings, however, was revealed in the patients over 40 years of age. Also, a statistically significantly higher incidence of positive findings was revealed in the apex as compared with other localizations. During the period observed, there was the raise of the number of patients only followed up after the conization without reconization. Also evident was decreasing in the number of histerectomies followed by increasing in the number of reconizations, as the method for reintervention. The most common cause of histerectomy was the apex positive findings with no statistical significance, while of reconization it was positive finding on lateral conizate margins with statistical significance. The association of the apical conizate positive finding with that in the curettements in all the cases was in correlation with positive findings at reintervention.

CONCLUSION: According to the results obtained by analyzing and statistical processing of the acquired data, it could be concluded that reconization does represent a more suitable reintervention in patients with positive conizate findings as compared to histerectomy.