COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus thrombolysis: the definite management of st elevation myocardial infarction.

The management of an ST elevation myocardial infarction has undergone significant changes in the past few years. Fibrinolytic agents have become more and more clot specific increasing their efficacy. However, percutaneous coronary intervention, along with its adjuvant therapy (glycoprotein IIB/IIIA receptor inhibitors and clopidrogel), have come to challenge fibrinolytic use. Many studies have demonstrated the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention as compared to fibrinolysis in the management of acute myocardial infarction by decreasing infarct size, myocardial function loss, and mortality.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app