COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Shorter hospital stay associated with fastrack postoperative care pathways and laparoscopic intestinal resection are not associated with increased physical activity.

Colorectal Disease 2004 November
OBJECTIVE: Recent prospective studies have shown that 'fast track' postoperative care protocols (FT) can reduce hospitalization after major intestinal surgery to 4.5 days, as compared to the 7-10 days with traditional management (TR) and 2.5 days after laparoscopic surgery (LC). We used computerized actigraphy (CA) to evaluate physical activity using TR, FT and LC approaches.

METHODS: Fifteen patients undergoing intestinal resection by LC, TR and FT were recruited. CA devices were placed on the wrist and ankle of each patient from day 1 until hospital discharge. Intra-patient and intergroup analyses were performed using 24 h evaluations, and periods from 0800-2000 h. Results are presented for, level of activity (LOA; activity counts per minute), activity index (AI;% epochs with activity) and acceleration index (ACI; change in activity rate during analysis period) for 0800-2000 h.

RESULTS: Levels of activity measured by wrist and ankle CA devices for the three different care protocols were: LC, 6263 +/- 8008 (wrist), 1640 +/- 3795 (ankle); FT 7874 +/- 8550 (wrist), 2153 +/- 4838 (ankle); LC 8526 +/- 9917 (wrist), 2326 +/- 4905 (ankle). Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in LC than FT and TR patients (P < 0.01). There was no significant increase in wrist or ankle LOA for FT or LC patients. Similarly, there was no difference in AI or ACI.

CONCLUSION: Although CA is an easily standardized method of evaluating physical activity after major abdominal surgery, no difference can be demonstrated between activity levels in patients managed by differing care pathways. Reductions in stay may be associated with factors other than a change in the level of physical activity after surgery.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app