We have located links that may give you full text access.
English Abstract
Journal Article
[Antihyperalgesic activity of chlorimipramine and sodium phenytoin in an induced model of neuropathic pain in rats].
Cirugia y Cirujanos 2004
INTRODUCTION: Neuropathic pain results from injury or impairment of the nervous system manifested by pain syndrome. Experimental models have been used to study its effects and how to suppress these. Tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) and anticonvulsant (AC) have been used for treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the antihyperanalgesic efficiency of intraperitoneal (IP) chlorimipramine (CIP) vs IP phenytoine (DFH) for induced neuropathic pain in an experimental animal model.
METHODS: After making a surgical ligature of the sciatic nerve in the right leg of 18 male rats, the time of withdrawal of both claws immersed in hot (45 degrees C) and cold water (10 degrees C) was measured during a four week period before and after IP CIP, DFH, or placebo administered in a double blind study.
RESULTS: Significant statistical differences were observed in the time of withdrawal with CIP as compared with DFH and when both groups were compared with placebo (as tested by the paw immersion in hot water). When the thermal stimulus was cold water, an increase of the time of withdrawal was seen with DFH.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that CIP and FS are both effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain in an animal model, as well as for the treatment of secondary hiperalgesia.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the antihyperanalgesic efficiency of intraperitoneal (IP) chlorimipramine (CIP) vs IP phenytoine (DFH) for induced neuropathic pain in an experimental animal model.
METHODS: After making a surgical ligature of the sciatic nerve in the right leg of 18 male rats, the time of withdrawal of both claws immersed in hot (45 degrees C) and cold water (10 degrees C) was measured during a four week period before and after IP CIP, DFH, or placebo administered in a double blind study.
RESULTS: Significant statistical differences were observed in the time of withdrawal with CIP as compared with DFH and when both groups were compared with placebo (as tested by the paw immersion in hot water). When the thermal stimulus was cold water, an increase of the time of withdrawal was seen with DFH.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that CIP and FS are both effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain in an animal model, as well as for the treatment of secondary hiperalgesia.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app