Effects of bur abrasive particle size and abutment composition on preparation of ceramic implant abutments.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Amid increasing use of preparable ceramic implant abutments, there is a lack of quantitative data to show which abrasive particle size of diamond bur yields the fastest reduction and provides the smoothest surface.

PURPOSE: The research aim was to determine the effects of diamond bur abrasive particle size and abutment material composition on preparation efficiency, prepared surface roughness, and surface deterioration of diamond burs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifteen alumina (Cera Base) and 15 zirconia (ZiReal) implant abutments were each machined using a high-speed hand piece with a diamond bur having 1 of 3 abrasive particle sizes (150, 100, or 30 microm) (n=5). Control abutments (n=5) were analyzed without machining. Abutments were weighed before starting and between machining cycles. Three profilometry measurements (root mean square surface roughness) were made for each abutment. Scanning electron micrographs were made of each bur. Lost abrasive particles were then counted on each micrograph through a randomly placed template. Two-way analysis of variance (alpha=0.05) was used to test for significant effects.

RESULTS: Bur abrasive particle size and ceramic type had a significant interactive effect on the amount of material removed (P<.001). Super coarse (150 microm) burs yielded the roughest surfaces for each abutment material (P<.001), and prepared alumina surfaces were rougher than zirconia surfaces (P<.001). Super coarse burs showed the highest proportion of lost particles (P<.001). Abutment composition did not significantly affect bur wear.

CONCLUSION: Super coarse burs yielded the most efficient material removal for alumina abutments. All abrasive particle sizes removed a similar amount of material from zirconia abutments. Fine-grained alumina abutments experienced greater material removal and rougher prepared surfaces compared with zirconia abutments. Material was removed by an intergranular fracture mechanism for alumina abutments, in contrast to transgranular fracture for zirconia abutments.