We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Needlescopic cholecystectomy: prospective study of 150 patients.
Hong Kong Medical Journal 2003 August
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of cholecystectomy using miniaturised instruments of 3 mm or less in diameter.
DESIGN: Prospective study on patients with gallstones, with or without related complications.
SETTING: Private hospital, Hong Kong.
PATIENTS: From September 1997 to September 2002, 150 of the 180 consecutive patients managed were included in the present study.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All patients were operated on with a standard four-port technique. Mini-laparoscopes of different sizes were used throughout the study period, which included 2-mm (n=33) fibre-optic laparoscope, and 2.5-mm (n=61) and 3-mm (n=56) laparoscopes of Hopkins rod lens system. The cystic duct and artery were secured either by extracorporeal ties or 10-mm clips passed through the umbilicus. The time taken from dissection to division of the cystic duct and artery, and to complete the operation were documented.
RESULTS: The operation was successfully completed with needlescopic instruments in 127 (85%) patients, even though patients with acute cholecystitis and history of common bile duct stones were included. Use of larger-diameter mini-laparoscopes decreased the time needed to divide the cystic duct and artery, to detach the gall bladder from the liver, and to complete the operation. There were no deaths. One minor bile duct injury developed secondary to extensive cauterisation of the gall bladder fossa.
CONCLUSION: Needlescopic cholecystectomy with minor technical modification can be completed within a duration comparable to standard laparoscopy at no increased risk for the great majority of patients with gallstones.
DESIGN: Prospective study on patients with gallstones, with or without related complications.
SETTING: Private hospital, Hong Kong.
PATIENTS: From September 1997 to September 2002, 150 of the 180 consecutive patients managed were included in the present study.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All patients were operated on with a standard four-port technique. Mini-laparoscopes of different sizes were used throughout the study period, which included 2-mm (n=33) fibre-optic laparoscope, and 2.5-mm (n=61) and 3-mm (n=56) laparoscopes of Hopkins rod lens system. The cystic duct and artery were secured either by extracorporeal ties or 10-mm clips passed through the umbilicus. The time taken from dissection to division of the cystic duct and artery, and to complete the operation were documented.
RESULTS: The operation was successfully completed with needlescopic instruments in 127 (85%) patients, even though patients with acute cholecystitis and history of common bile duct stones were included. Use of larger-diameter mini-laparoscopes decreased the time needed to divide the cystic duct and artery, to detach the gall bladder from the liver, and to complete the operation. There were no deaths. One minor bile duct injury developed secondary to extensive cauterisation of the gall bladder fossa.
CONCLUSION: Needlescopic cholecystectomy with minor technical modification can be completed within a duration comparable to standard laparoscopy at no increased risk for the great majority of patients with gallstones.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app