We have located links that may give you full text access.
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
[Effects of peripheral functional electrostimulation in obstructive bladder instability].
Actas Urologicas Españolas 2002 April
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of peripheral functional electrical stimulation (FES) in patients with detrusor instability (DI) secondary to obstructive Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).
SUBJECTS, MATERIAL & METHODS: Nine patients with urodynamically proven DI secondary to BPH were investigated. Sensory and pudendo-anal reflex thresholds were determined in each patient to individually optimise FES. A standard fill cystometry was then performed and individually optimised FES was given when an unstable detrusor contraction occurred. Non stimulated contractions were used as controls. The effects of FES were analysed by measuring the mean area under the unstable pressure curves with and without FES and were expressed as percentage suppression.
RESULTS: The percentage suppression in the mean area under the curves after stimulation was < 10%. There was no statistically significant difference between controls and FES using a two tailed, paired students t-Test (p > 0.1) at 95% confidence level (p > or = 0.05).
CONCLUSION: FES did not significantly suppress unstable bladder contractions in patients with DI secondary to BPH. This finding suggests that obstructive DI does not depend on sacral reflex mechanisms and supports the view that it has a peripheral pathophysiological origin (myogenic and/or nerve endings).
SUBJECTS, MATERIAL & METHODS: Nine patients with urodynamically proven DI secondary to BPH were investigated. Sensory and pudendo-anal reflex thresholds were determined in each patient to individually optimise FES. A standard fill cystometry was then performed and individually optimised FES was given when an unstable detrusor contraction occurred. Non stimulated contractions were used as controls. The effects of FES were analysed by measuring the mean area under the unstable pressure curves with and without FES and were expressed as percentage suppression.
RESULTS: The percentage suppression in the mean area under the curves after stimulation was < 10%. There was no statistically significant difference between controls and FES using a two tailed, paired students t-Test (p > 0.1) at 95% confidence level (p > or = 0.05).
CONCLUSION: FES did not significantly suppress unstable bladder contractions in patients with DI secondary to BPH. This finding suggests that obstructive DI does not depend on sacral reflex mechanisms and supports the view that it has a peripheral pathophysiological origin (myogenic and/or nerve endings).
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
The Effect of Albumin Administration in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Critical Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 8
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app