We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
[Significance of the follow-up of patients with ischemic cardiopathy in the treatment with atorvastatin as secondary prevention. Pilot study].
Anales de Medicina Interna : Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna 2002 January
OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of different intensities of follow up when atorvastatin is used in the secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Design. Prospective study with balanced randomized allocation including a concurrent control group.
SETTING: Ambulatory care.
PATIENTS: 75 patients hospitalized because of acute coronary syndromes were administered atorvastatin as secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease and randomized either to intensive follow up or to a control visit 6 months apart.
INTERVENTIONS: The intensive follow up group (40 patients) was controlled every 2 months as outpatients and a physical examine and lipid profile was done, enhancing diet and exercise and adjusting the statin dose. The control group was evaluated just once after a 6 six month period.
RESULTS: 88% were males and the average age was 63.7 +/- 10 year. Basal characteristics, myocardial infarction, revascularized procedures and initial chemistry and lipid profile were similar in both groups, although there was a higher proportion of patients in the control group taking ACE. After 6 months total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides reduction was higher in the intensive follow up group (33 vs. 24, 34 vs. 26 y 51 vs. 24 mg/dl, respectively) without realising statistical significance. Hospital readmissions were lesser in the intensive group (7.3% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.114). There was one death in each group.
CONCLUSIONS: Results show a tendency indicating that follow up planification is relevant to obtain the target lipid level recommended in the secondary prevention.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Design. Prospective study with balanced randomized allocation including a concurrent control group.
SETTING: Ambulatory care.
PATIENTS: 75 patients hospitalized because of acute coronary syndromes were administered atorvastatin as secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease and randomized either to intensive follow up or to a control visit 6 months apart.
INTERVENTIONS: The intensive follow up group (40 patients) was controlled every 2 months as outpatients and a physical examine and lipid profile was done, enhancing diet and exercise and adjusting the statin dose. The control group was evaluated just once after a 6 six month period.
RESULTS: 88% were males and the average age was 63.7 +/- 10 year. Basal characteristics, myocardial infarction, revascularized procedures and initial chemistry and lipid profile were similar in both groups, although there was a higher proportion of patients in the control group taking ACE. After 6 months total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides reduction was higher in the intensive follow up group (33 vs. 24, 34 vs. 26 y 51 vs. 24 mg/dl, respectively) without realising statistical significance. Hospital readmissions were lesser in the intensive group (7.3% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.114). There was one death in each group.
CONCLUSIONS: Results show a tendency indicating that follow up planification is relevant to obtain the target lipid level recommended in the secondary prevention.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app