We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
General anesthesia versus monitored anesthesia care with remifentanil for assisted reproductive technologies: effect on pregnancy rate.
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2002 Februrary
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcome of assisted reproductive technology procedures in women who undergo monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with remifentanil versus general anesthesia.
DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis.
SETTING: University hospital.
PATIENTS: 251 ASA physical status I and II women participating in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) program.
INTERVENTIONS: During the first phase of the study, all patients underwent general anesthesia induction with alfentanil, propofol, and nitrous oxide, which was maintained with isoflurane or propofol infusion. In the second phase of the study, all patients received a standardized MAC technique with a remifentanil infusion; local anesthetics were not used.
MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was pregnancy rate per transfer. The number of oocytes collected, fertilized, and cleaved was recorded, as was the number of oocytes transferred.
MAIN RESULTS: Patients who underwent MAC had a greater pregnancy rate with IVF (28.2 vs. 16.3%), with ICSI (32.2% vs. 18.8%), and overall (30.6% vs. 17.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy rates in women undergoing transvaginal oocyte retrieval for assisted reproductive technologies were significantly higher with a remifentanil-based MAC technique than with a general anesthetic technique.
DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis.
SETTING: University hospital.
PATIENTS: 251 ASA physical status I and II women participating in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) program.
INTERVENTIONS: During the first phase of the study, all patients underwent general anesthesia induction with alfentanil, propofol, and nitrous oxide, which was maintained with isoflurane or propofol infusion. In the second phase of the study, all patients received a standardized MAC technique with a remifentanil infusion; local anesthetics were not used.
MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was pregnancy rate per transfer. The number of oocytes collected, fertilized, and cleaved was recorded, as was the number of oocytes transferred.
MAIN RESULTS: Patients who underwent MAC had a greater pregnancy rate with IVF (28.2 vs. 16.3%), with ICSI (32.2% vs. 18.8%), and overall (30.6% vs. 17.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy rates in women undergoing transvaginal oocyte retrieval for assisted reproductive technologies were significantly higher with a remifentanil-based MAC technique than with a general anesthetic technique.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app