Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Differential ethanol intake in high and low responders to novelty.

The aim of the study was to determine whether high responders (HR) and low responders (LR) to novelty, selected from an outbred Wistar rat population, show differences in ethanol consumption. HR and LR differ in catecholaminergic activity in the nucleus accumbens as well as in brain sensitivity to corticosteroids, biological features believed to play a role in ethanol consumption. Due to these differences it was predicted that HR would consume less ethanol and show less preference than would LR. Animals were maintained on a schedule of alternative day presentation of ethanol. Starting with an ethanol presentation of 2% in a free choice with water, ethanol solutions were presented and increased by increments of 1% every second day. HR showed a preference for water over ethanol, whereas LR showed no preference for water over ethanol. In order to determine intake and preference stability, animals were switched to daily presentations of ethanol and maintained on a 10% ethanol solution for 18 days. Individual-specific differences remained stable throughout the entire period. Given the available knowledge about biological differences between HR and LR, the present data indicate that these animals are good models for the study of the mechanisms underlying individual-specific differences in the behavioral responses to ethanol.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app