We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Various spiral CT protocols and their significance in the diagnosis of aortic dissections: results of a prospective study].
PURPOSE: Development of an optimized Spiral CT protocol type for the diagnosis of aortic dissections.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 121 consecutive CT examinations applying 5 different protocol types were blindly read by two experienced radiologists and then compared with: (a) 45 biplane transesophageal echocardiographies (TEE), (b) 52 transthoracic echocardiographies (TTE), (c) 52 operative findings and, furthermore, related to the clinical course over at least six months in 79 patients.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of the spiral computed tomography for detection of dissection was 97% (biplane TEE: 88%), the specificity 100% (biplane TEE: 91%). In 15% dissections with atypical origin and entries (mid-portion of the aortic arch, distal thoracic aorta, etc.) were found. The optimal CT-protocol was the one with a combination of two separate but adjacent spiral scans achieving high spatial resolution for the aortic arch and enough spatial resection for the residual aorta (1. helical scan 3 mm collimation, pitch 2. 2. helical scan 5 mm collimation and pitch 2, 130 ml contrast medium at 5 ml/s) with a classification accuracy of 100%, visualization of entries of 100%, reentries of 100% (40% direct, 60% indirect). The identification of the ostia of the aortic branches were: supraaortic 93%, visceral 100%, left renal artery 100%, right renal artery 93%, iliac 64%. The CT angiography, designed as aortic arch angiography, showed a good contrast in the aortic arch vessels (79-86%) and the visceral vessels too (91%).
CONCLUSION: Thoracic CT angiography can be used as gold standard in the primary evaluation of aortic dissections.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 121 consecutive CT examinations applying 5 different protocol types were blindly read by two experienced radiologists and then compared with: (a) 45 biplane transesophageal echocardiographies (TEE), (b) 52 transthoracic echocardiographies (TTE), (c) 52 operative findings and, furthermore, related to the clinical course over at least six months in 79 patients.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of the spiral computed tomography for detection of dissection was 97% (biplane TEE: 88%), the specificity 100% (biplane TEE: 91%). In 15% dissections with atypical origin and entries (mid-portion of the aortic arch, distal thoracic aorta, etc.) were found. The optimal CT-protocol was the one with a combination of two separate but adjacent spiral scans achieving high spatial resolution for the aortic arch and enough spatial resection for the residual aorta (1. helical scan 3 mm collimation, pitch 2. 2. helical scan 5 mm collimation and pitch 2, 130 ml contrast medium at 5 ml/s) with a classification accuracy of 100%, visualization of entries of 100%, reentries of 100% (40% direct, 60% indirect). The identification of the ostia of the aortic branches were: supraaortic 93%, visceral 100%, left renal artery 100%, right renal artery 93%, iliac 64%. The CT angiography, designed as aortic arch angiography, showed a good contrast in the aortic arch vessels (79-86%) and the visceral vessels too (91%).
CONCLUSION: Thoracic CT angiography can be used as gold standard in the primary evaluation of aortic dissections.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app