Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Integrated backscatter assessment of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: relation with clinical and echocardiographic parameters.

Integrated backscatter (IB) provides the quantitative assessment of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (SEC). The IB intensity of the left atrial cavity relative to the left ventricular cavity is related to atrial thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or sinus rhythm. However, little is known about the relation between the quantitative SEC value of the left atrial cavity and variables implying thromboembolism in nonvalvular AF. To examine this relation, we performed transesophageal echo-cardiography with IB analysis in 65 patients with chronic nonvalvular AF. The quantitative SEC value of the left atrial cavity was defined as the difference between atrial IB intensity and ventricular IB intensity (corrected IB intensity). The corrected IB intensity was correlated with the left atrial dimension (r = 0.25, P =.049), the left atrial appendage velocity (r = -0.41, P <.001), and the duration of AF (r = 0.23, P =. 023). The corrected IB intensity was higher in patients who had a history of hypertension (3.2 +/- 2.2 dB versus 2.0 +/- 1.6 dB, P =. 018), SEC (3.9 +/- 1.9 dB versus 1.4 +/- 1.1 dB, P =.002), and left atrial thrombus (4.5 +/- 2.7 dB versus 2.2 +/- 1.7 dB, P <.001) when compared with those who did not have these abnormalities. The corrected IB intensity was significantly lower in patients with significant mitral regurgitation than in those without it (1.1 +/- 1. 2 dB versus 2.7 +/- 2.0 dB, P =.036). When the cutoff value of the corrected IB intensity was set at >/=2.0 dB, the sensitivity for left atrial thrombus was 78% and the specificity was 55%. In patients with chronic nonvalvular AF, the quantitative SEC value of the left atrial cavity depends on the duration of AF as well as the left atrial dimension and appendage velocity. Although IB may be capable of identifying patients with higher risk of cardiogenic embolism, a large-scale prospective study is needed to actually establish this.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app