We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Embryonic karyotype of abortuses in relation to the number of previous miscarriages.
Fertility and Sterility 2000 Februrary
OBJECTIVE: To examine the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in products of conception from patients with recurrent miscarriages in relation to the number of previous miscarriages.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis.
SETTING: Nagoya City University Medical Hospital.
PATIENT(S): A total of 1,309 women with a history of 2-20 consecutive first-trimester abortions.
INTERVENTION(S): Chromosomal analysis performed on products of conception with use of a standard G-banding technique.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The frequencies of abnormal and normal embryonic karyotypes for each number of previous abortions were studied. The subsequent pregnancy outcome of patients whose previous miscarriages were karyotyped were studied along with the predictive value of karyotyping of previous miscarriages for subsequent miscarriages.
RESULT(S): The miscarriage rate increased with the number of previous spontaneous abortions. The frequency of abnormal embryonic karyotypes significantly decreased and that of normal embryonic karyotypes significantly increased with the number of previous abortions. Among 71 patients whose embryonic karyotypes were normal, 44 aborted subsequently, and 23 of 60 patients whose embryonic karyotypes were abnormal aborted subsequently. Patients with a previous normal embryonic karyotype aborted more frequently than those with an abnormal karyotype.
CONCLUSION(S): The frequency of normal embryonic karyotypes significantly increases with the number of previous abortions, and a normal karyotype in a previous pregnancy is a predictor of subsequent miscarriage.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis.
SETTING: Nagoya City University Medical Hospital.
PATIENT(S): A total of 1,309 women with a history of 2-20 consecutive first-trimester abortions.
INTERVENTION(S): Chromosomal analysis performed on products of conception with use of a standard G-banding technique.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The frequencies of abnormal and normal embryonic karyotypes for each number of previous abortions were studied. The subsequent pregnancy outcome of patients whose previous miscarriages were karyotyped were studied along with the predictive value of karyotyping of previous miscarriages for subsequent miscarriages.
RESULT(S): The miscarriage rate increased with the number of previous spontaneous abortions. The frequency of abnormal embryonic karyotypes significantly decreased and that of normal embryonic karyotypes significantly increased with the number of previous abortions. Among 71 patients whose embryonic karyotypes were normal, 44 aborted subsequently, and 23 of 60 patients whose embryonic karyotypes were abnormal aborted subsequently. Patients with a previous normal embryonic karyotype aborted more frequently than those with an abnormal karyotype.
CONCLUSION(S): The frequency of normal embryonic karyotypes significantly increases with the number of previous abortions, and a normal karyotype in a previous pregnancy is a predictor of subsequent miscarriage.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app