Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Are salivary immunoglobulin A and lysozyme biomarkers of stress among nurses?

Salivary immunoglobulin A (IgA) and lysozyme have been studied as possible biomarkers of stress. This study examined the stress levels among female nurses in various units and the relationship between these stress levels and salivary IgA and lysozyme secretion. One hundred ninety-five (43%) of 457 eligible female nurses from surgical wards/operating theaters (SURG), medical wards (MED), and outpatient clinics/day-surgery theaters (OPD) completed a self-administered questionnaire. From this group of 195 nurses, 124 provided a salivary sample accumulated over 5 minutes. Stress levels were assessed with a ten-point Stress Assessment Score (SAS) for Asians and a direct question on perceived life stress. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and lyso-plate methods were used to determine salivary IgA and lysozyme levels. Forty-five percent of SURG, 35% of MED, and 17% of OPD nurses scored at least four points on the SAS. SURG nurses had the lowest IgA secretion (geometric mean; 95% confidence interval [CI]) rates (43 micrograms/min; 36 to 51 micrograms/min). The other groups had significantly higher salivary IgA secretion rates: MED (96 micrograms/min; 80 to 116 micrograms/min) and OPD (77 micrograms/min; 60 to 98 micrograms/min) Findings for salivary lysozyme (microgram/min) were similar; SURG (9 micrograms/min; 6 to 13 micrograms/min) MED (19 micrograms/min; 12 to 28 micrograms/min) and OPD (16 micrograms/min; 9 to 28 micrograms/min). The salivary IgA (Spearman's r = -0.22, P = 0.01) but not the lysozyme (Spearman's r = -0.01, P = 0.9) secretion rate correlated negatively with SAS. Nurses working in various units under different conditions experienced dissimilar levels of stress. Salivary IgA, but not lysozyme, correlated inversely with self-reported levels of stress. It may thus be a potential biomarker in future studies on stress.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app