We have located links that may give you full text access.
Significance of axillary lymph node extranodal soft tissue extension and indications for postmastectomy irradiation.
Cancer 1999 October 2
BACKGROUND: Extranodal soft tissue extension of axillary lymph node metastases (ETE) has been considered an indication for postmastectomy radiotherapy, including the axilla. However, it is unclear whether patients with ETE are at an increased risk of axillary recurrence.
METHODS: From a single institutional database of 2362 patients with breast carcinoma treated between 1974-1994, a total of 487 patients who underwent mastectomy for lymph node positive, infiltrating (T1-T3) breast carcinoma was found. All the patients had pathologically confirmed axillary lymph node metastases and negative surgical margins; none had received postoperative irradiation. Of these patients, 50 had histologically documented axillary ETE. Forty-three patients had a minimum follow-up of at least 1 year and comprise the study population. The median follow-up time of surviving ETE positive patients was 79 months. Twenty-five patients (58.1%) received adjuvant systemic therapy. Sites of first failure were local or distant. Local failure was categorized further as chest wall failure, axillary failure, supraclavicular lymph node failure, or internal mammary lymph node failure.
RESULTS: For the 43 patients with ETE, the median patient age was 59.5 years (range, 38-81 years) and the median tumor size was 3.6 cm (range, 0.5-12.0 cm). The median number of positive axillary lymph nodes was 6 (range, 1-36 lymph nodes) versus 2 (range, 1-30 lymph nodes) for all T1-T3 ETE positive patients compared with ETE negative patients (P < 0. 001). The risk of ETE increased significantly with increasing numbers of axillary lymph node metastases (P < 0.001). Of the patients with ETE, 16 (37.2%) developed recurrent disease. ETE positive patients with disease recurrence had significantly greater numbers of positive axillary lymph nodes (median, 10 lymph nodes) than those patients who were recurrence free (median, 4 lymph nodes) (P = 0.02). The site of first failure was local in 7 patients (16. 3%) and distant in 9 patients (20.9%). All patients with local recurrence had chest wall failures; there were no isolated lymph node recurrences. The only simultaneous local and distant failure was in one patient presenting with supraclavicular and intraabdominal metastases.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of axillary recurrence, either as an isolated event or as part of simultaneous failure, is extremely low, even in patients with ETE. These data suggest that patients with ETE frequently have higher numbers of positive axillary lymph nodes and on that basis are at risk for local recurrence and as a rule would be considered for postmastectomy irradiation. However, these data suggest that the presence of ETE is not an indication for routine postmastectomy axillary lymph node irradiation.
METHODS: From a single institutional database of 2362 patients with breast carcinoma treated between 1974-1994, a total of 487 patients who underwent mastectomy for lymph node positive, infiltrating (T1-T3) breast carcinoma was found. All the patients had pathologically confirmed axillary lymph node metastases and negative surgical margins; none had received postoperative irradiation. Of these patients, 50 had histologically documented axillary ETE. Forty-three patients had a minimum follow-up of at least 1 year and comprise the study population. The median follow-up time of surviving ETE positive patients was 79 months. Twenty-five patients (58.1%) received adjuvant systemic therapy. Sites of first failure were local or distant. Local failure was categorized further as chest wall failure, axillary failure, supraclavicular lymph node failure, or internal mammary lymph node failure.
RESULTS: For the 43 patients with ETE, the median patient age was 59.5 years (range, 38-81 years) and the median tumor size was 3.6 cm (range, 0.5-12.0 cm). The median number of positive axillary lymph nodes was 6 (range, 1-36 lymph nodes) versus 2 (range, 1-30 lymph nodes) for all T1-T3 ETE positive patients compared with ETE negative patients (P < 0. 001). The risk of ETE increased significantly with increasing numbers of axillary lymph node metastases (P < 0.001). Of the patients with ETE, 16 (37.2%) developed recurrent disease. ETE positive patients with disease recurrence had significantly greater numbers of positive axillary lymph nodes (median, 10 lymph nodes) than those patients who were recurrence free (median, 4 lymph nodes) (P = 0.02). The site of first failure was local in 7 patients (16. 3%) and distant in 9 patients (20.9%). All patients with local recurrence had chest wall failures; there were no isolated lymph node recurrences. The only simultaneous local and distant failure was in one patient presenting with supraclavicular and intraabdominal metastases.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of axillary recurrence, either as an isolated event or as part of simultaneous failure, is extremely low, even in patients with ETE. These data suggest that patients with ETE frequently have higher numbers of positive axillary lymph nodes and on that basis are at risk for local recurrence and as a rule would be considered for postmastectomy irradiation. However, these data suggest that the presence of ETE is not an indication for routine postmastectomy axillary lymph node irradiation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app