mini PNL

The aim of this study is to present our experience on the use of the holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser in pediatric patients for pediatric urolithiasis and describe the optimal settings. A total of 116 children who underwent urolithiasis treatment (percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), ureterorenoscopy (URS), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS)) were included. The mean age of the patients was 8.4 ± 5.2 years (1-18). The mean follow-up was 26 ± 8.8 months (9-45). There was no difference between the mean stone sizes of PNL and RIRS patients (p = 0...

Ultra-mini PNL is increasingly preferred in the treatment of kidney stones. Unlike routine applications of the ultra-mini PNL technique, we aimed to perform kidney stones treatment with an epiduroscopic device that can pass through 11-13-Fr ureteral access sheaths with a flexible structure and which is routine in neurosurgical practice. The study was planned prospectively. The study included 52 patients with mid-sized kidney stones who had presented to our clinic between July 2017 and January 2019. The ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy was carried out with epiduroscopy routinely used in neurosurgery practice, which can pass through 11-13-Fr ureteral access and has a flexible structure...

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the results of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (TPNL) and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SPNL) for the management of nephrolithiasis in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data for 48 patients aged lesser than 18 years who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) between January 2010 and June 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were classified into 2 categories depending on tube placement...

OBJECTIVE: To compare miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in children with 10-20 mm renal stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2015 and 2019, 63 pediatric patients aged under 16 years who under went mini-PNL and RIRS for the treatment of kidney stones sized 10-20 mm were analyzed retrospectively. The mini-PNL group (n=30) was defined as group 1 and the RIRS group (n=33) was defined as group 2. Peri-operative data including stone-free rate, operative time, fluoroscopy time, hospitalization time, number of anesthesia sessions, complication rates, and cost-effectiveness were analyzed...

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the success and complication rates of the anterograde and retrograde Ureterorenoscopy (URS) for impacted upper ureteral stones in patients > 65 years of age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 146 patients >65 years of age and underwent anterograde URS (n=68) in supine position or retrograde URS (n=78) for upper ureteral impacted stones>10 mm between January 2014 and September 2018 were collected prospectively. The groups were compared for success and complication rates, duration of operation, hospital stay, and ancillary procedures...

PURPOSE: Radiological parameters predicting a postoperative stone-free status (SFS) or a complicated perioperative course of mini-PNL, are scarce. Our aim was to identify such factors for prone 17.5F mini-PNL. METHODS: A monocentric cohort of 103 cases was retrospectively analysed for factors predicting SFS and relevant complications, i.e. Clavien-Dindo (CD) ≥ 2. Parameters measured on preoperative supine CT included maximal stone diameter, skin-to-stone distance (SSD), ideal tract length (ITL), access angle, minimal T12-Lower Kidney Pole distance (T12LP) and minimal Iliac Crest-Lower Kidney Pole distance (ICLP)...

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (sPCNL) and super-mini PCNL (SMP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 150 patients presenting with renal calculi of <2 cm were randomised to either sPCNL (Group 1) or SMP (Group 2). Randomisation was based on centralised computer-generated numbers. Variables studied included: stone-free rates (SFRs), operative time, intra- and postoperative complications, postoperative pain score, analgesic requirement, and hospital stay...

OBJECTIVE: To compare efficiency, safety and full cost of lower retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) types for the treatment of lower calyceal stones between 1 and 2 cm in size. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized study. In all, 175 patients were randomly divided into five groups of 35 patients each: Group A was managed by RIRS, Group B by micro PNL, Group C by ultra-mini PNL, Group D by mini PNL, and Group E by standard PNL...

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of learning curve on supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) outcomes. METHODS: The aim of the study was to include a total of 75 patients. All of the patients were operated on by the same team, which had experience of at least 100 prone mini-PNL cases. The team was led by a surgeon who had observed 40 supine conventional PNL procedures (sheath size 24 Fr) over a period of 3 months at an endourology center with experience in supine PNL and surgeries were performed by the same primary surgeon...

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is the primary treatment option for renal stones > 20 mm in diameter. Mini-PNL gained popularity with its minimally invasive nature. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of ballistic and laser lithotripsy with the combined use of both techniques. Data of 312 patients underwent mini-PNL for renal stones with Hounsfield Unit > 1000 was investigated retrospectively. We identified 104 patients underwent combined ballistic and laser lithotripsy. Propensity score technique was used to create the laser and ballistic lithotripsy groups...

Aim: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) and standard PNL (sPNL) in a group of patients who had a history of PNL and/or open renal surgery (secondary patients). Materials and Methods: The study included 148 patients who underwent secondary PNL between November 2016 and September 2018. The patients with kidney stone ≥2 cm were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups as mPNL and sPNL. For both groups, demographic data, stone characteristics, and operative and postoperative data were recorded prospectively...

PURPOSE: Several energy sources are available to clear stones during PCNL. Required improvements are faster stone clearance, optimized suction and ease of use while maintaining high patient safety standard. EMS LithoClast® Trilogy, is the first device combining electromagnetic impactor with ultrasonic energy and suction, all-in-one probe. Animal studies and in vitro phantom stone studies have proven safety and efficacy of this device. We aim to study safety and clinical efficacy of Trilogy in our patients...

OBJECTIVE: To examine and predicting stone-free rates (SFRs) after minimally invasive-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PNL) based on computed tomography (CT), instead of X-ray or ultrasound control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 146 mini-PNL patients with pre- and postoperative CT scans. Patient and stone characteristics were assessed. Stone-free status was defined as ≤3 mm residual fragment after mini-PNL according to postsurgery CT scan. Multivariable logistic regression analyses predicted stone-free status after mini-PNL...

AIM: To compare the results of a single tract versus multi-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a period of 6 years, a total of 2,264 PNLs was performed at the N.A. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology, of which 875 PNLs were done for stage K3-K4 staghorn calculi. Among them, 244 (27.7%) patients underwent multi-tract PNL. We included 873 patients in our study. The median stone size was 59 (46; 88) mm. Two, three and four percutaneous tracts were used in 165 (67...

PURPOSE: To investigate renal pelvic pressures during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the standard, mini, and ultramini PCNL systems. METHODS: We studied an ultramini PCNL system (UMP, outer shaft diameter 13F), a mini PCNL system (MPCNL, shaft 18F, nephroscope 12F), and a standard PCNL system (SPCNL, shaft 27F, nephroscope 24F). Pressure profiles were first investigated in an open model setup, subsequently in a closed model, and finally in an ex vivo porcine kidney...

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate whether these parameters could be guiding for us in selection between retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) procedures in kidney stones that are smaller than 2 cm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients who had kidney stones smaller than two cm and were planned to undergo surgery were randomly distributed into 2 groups prospectively. RIRS was performed in the RIRS group using a 7.5-F fiberoptic flexible ureterorenoscope while mini-PNL group was dilated up to 16...

OBJECTIVE: To compare safety and efficacy of bilateral single-session mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (BSS-Mini-PNL) vs staged-Mini-PNL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with bilateral renal stones indicated for PNL were managed with BSS-Mini-PNL (45 patients and 90 renal units) and prospectively compared vs staged-Mini-PNL (55 patients and 110 renal units) between July 2014 and December 2017. Mini-PNL was done through 18-Fr tract in prone position under regional anesthesia and fluoroscopy using pneumatic lithotripsy...

We aimed to compare the outcomes of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) and standard PNL techniques in the treatment of renal stones ≥ 2 cm. The study was designed as a randomized prospective study between January 2016 and April 2017. The patients with a kidney stone ≥ 2 cm were included in the study. Patients who had uncorrectable bleeding diathesis, abnormal renal anatomy, skeletal tract abnormalities, pregnant patients and pediatric patients (< 18 years old) were excluded from the study...

PURPOSE: To compare the pain status and stone free rates of flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) versus mini-percutaneousnephrolithotomy (mini-PNL) for the treatment of 1-to 2-cm renal stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was retrospectively designed with match paired method. Between January 2013 and December 2016, 387 patients underwent stone surgery for renal stones, 45 patients underwent FURS and 45 patients underwent mini-PNL. 90 patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical procedures...

To compare the outcome of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PNL) versus standard-PNL for renal stones. Retrospective study was performed between March 2010 and May 2013 for patients treated by Mini-PNL or standard-PNL through 18 and 30 Fr tracts, respectively, using pneumatic lithotripsy. Semirigid ureteroscope (8.5/11.5 Fr) was used for Mini-PNL and 24 Fr nephroscope for standard-PNL. Both groups were compared in stone free rate(SFR), complications and operative time using Student-t, Mann-Whitney, Chi square or Fisher's exact tests as appropriate in addition to logistic regression analysis...