Jasper P Sijberden, Tijs J Hoogteijling, Davit Aghayan, Francesca Ratti, Ek-Khoon Tan, Victoria Morrison-Jones, Jacopo Lanari, Louis Haentjens, Kongyuan Wei, Stylianos Tzedakis, John Martinie, Daniel Osei Bordom, Giuseppe Zimmitti, Kaitlyn Crespo, Paolo Magistri, Nadia Russolillo, Simone Conci, Burak Görgec, Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra, Daniel D'Souza, Gabriel Zozaya, Cèlia Caula, David Geller, Ricardo Robles Campos, Roland Croner, Shafiq Rehman, Elio Jovine, Mikhail Efanov, Adnan Alseidi, Riccardo Memeo, Ibrahim Dagher, Felice Giuliante, Ernesto Sparrelid, Jawad Ahmad, Tom Gallagher, Moritz Schmelzle, Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg, Åsmund Avdem Fretland, Federica Cipriani, Ye-Xin Koh, Steven White, Santi Lopez Ben, Fernando Rotellar, Pablo E Serrano, Marco Vivarelli, Andrea Ruzzenente, Alessandro Ferrero, Fabrizio Di Benedetto, Marc G Besselink, Iswanto Sucandy, Robert P Sutcliffe, Dionisios Vrochides, David Fuks, Rong Liu, Mathieu D'Hondt, Umberto Cillo, John N Primrose, Brian K P Goh, Luca A Aldrighetti, Bjørn Edwin, Mohammad Abu Hilal
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of robotic liver surgery (RLS) and laparoscopic liver surgery (LLS) in various settings. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Clear advantages of RLS over LLS have rarely been demonstrated, and the associated costs of robotic surgery are generally higher than those of laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, the exact role of the robotic approach in minimally invasive liver surgery remains to be defined. METHODS: In this international retrospective cohort study, the outcomes of patients who underwent RLS and LLS for all indications between 2009 and 2021 in 34 hepatobiliary referral centers were compared...
March 14, 2024: Annals of Surgery