keyword
https://read.qxmd.com/read/20810086/a-comparison-of-knot-security-and-loop-security-in-arthroscopic-knots-tied-with-newer-high-strength-suture-materials
#21
COMPARATIVE STUDY
Ian K Y Lo, Eloy Ochoa, Stephen S Burkhart
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the knot security and loop security of 2 sliding and 1 static arthroscopic knot tied with different types of suture material. METHODS: We evaluated 3 commonly used arthroscopic knots (surgeon's knot, Roeder knot, and Weston knot) tied with 6 different braided No. 2 sutures (FiberWire [Arthrex, Naples, FL]; Ethibond [Ethicon, Somerville, NJ]; Orthocord [DePuy Mitek, Raynham, MA]; Herculine [now called HiFi; ConMed Linvatec, Largo, FL]; MaxBraid [Arthrotek, Warsaw, IN]; and UltraBraid [Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA])...
September 2010: Arthroscopy
https://read.qxmd.com/read/20630693/endoscopic-plantar-fascia-release-by-hooked-soft-tissue-electrode-after-failed-shock-wave-therapy
#22
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Ossama El Shazly, Rana A El Hilaly, Maged M Abou El Soud, M Nabil M A El Sayed
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of endoscopic plantar fascia release (EPFR) after failed extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT). METHODS: Eighteen patients (twenty-one feet) had persistent painful heel after treatment by ESWT for at least 6 months. The treatment protocol included 2,000 pulses of 0.12 mJ/mm(2) given in 1 session weekly for 7 sessions. Preoperative and postoperative assessment of pain and functional evaluation were done blindly by the second author using a visual analog scale (VAS) score and the modified American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score for the hindfoot...
September 2010: Arthroscopy
https://read.qxmd.com/read/20511034/cyclic-load-testing-and-ultimate-failure-strength-of-suture-anchors-in-the-acetabular-rim
#23
COMPARATIVE STUDY
Michell Ruiz-Suarez, Jorge Aziz-Jacobo, F Alan Barber
PURPOSE: To determine the resistance to cyclic stress and load-to-failure strength of several suture anchors suitable for hip arthroscopy. METHODS: Ten polyetheretherketone (PEEK) PushLock, PEEK SutureTak, and Bio-SutureTak anchors (Arthrex, Naples, FL); Lupine Loop BR anchors (DePuy Mitek, Norwood, MA); Bio-Mini Revo anchors (ConMed Linvatec, Largo, FL); and BioRaptor 2.9 AB anchors (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA) were inserted in rotation into different locations on the rim of 4 matched pairs of potted acetabula clamped to the base of a servohydraulic testing machine...
June 2010: Arthroscopy
https://read.qxmd.com/read/20206045/evaluation-of-a-new-femoral-fixation-device-in-a-simulated-anterior-cruciate-ligament-reconstruction
#24
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Andrew Speirs, David Simon, Peter Lapner
PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro biomechanical study was to determine the cyclic elongation and failure properties of a new anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction device and compare the results with several devices that are currently available. METHODS: We performed 10 ACL reconstructions in 4 groups using fresh porcine femurs and doubled lateral extensor of the toes tendons. Manufacturer guidelines were followed for fixation by use of either of 2 cortical suspension devices (XO Button [ConMed Linvatec, Largo, FL] and EndoButton CL [Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA]), a bio-interference screw (BioScrew; ConMed Linvatec), or a corticocancellous fixation device (Pinn-ACL; ConMed Linvatec)...
March 2010: Arthroscopy
https://read.qxmd.com/read/19171280/cyclic-load-and-failure-behavior-of-arthroscopic-knots-and-high-strength-sutures
#25
COMPARATIVE STUDY
F Alan Barber, Morley A Herbert, R Cole Beavis
PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical performance of several different sutures by evaluating knot security and load to failure strength using different arthroscopic knots. METHODS: Eight different No. 2 sutures (Ethibond [Ethicon, Somerville, NJ], FiberWire [Arthrex, Naples, FL], Orthocord [DePuy-Mitek, Norwood, MA], Hi-Fi [ConMed Linvatec, Largo, FL], Ultrabraid [Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA], ForceFiber [Stryker Endoscopy, San Jose, CA], MagnumWire [ArthroCare, Sunnyvale, CA], and MaxBraid PE [Arthrotek, Warsaw, IN]) were tied arthroscopically into standardized loops using 6 different knots (Weston, Tennessee slider, Duncan, SMC, Revo, and San Diego knot) 10 times each...
February 2009: Arthroscopy
https://read.qxmd.com/read/18607610/suture-anchor-fixation-strength-in-osteopenic-versus-non-osteopenic-bone-for-rotator-cuff-repair
#26
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Matthias F Pietschmann, Valerie Fröhlich, Andreas Ficklscherer, Mehmet F Gülecyüz, Bernd Wegener, Volkmar Jansson, Peter E Müller
INTRODUCTION: Rotator cuff tears are increasing with age. Does osteopenic bone have an influence on the pullout strength of suture anchors? MATERIALS AND METHODS: SPIRALOK 5.0 mm (DePuy Mitek), Super Revo 5 mm and UltraSorb (both ConMed Linvatec) suture anchors were tested in six osteopenic and six healthy human cadaveric humeri. Incremental cyclic loading was performed. The ultimate failure load, anchor displacement, and the mode of failure were recorded. RESULTS: In the non-osteopenic bone group, the absorbable SPIRALOK 5...
March 2009: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
https://read.qxmd.com/read/18396417/biomechanical-testing-of-a-new-knotless-suture-anchor-compared-with-established-anchors-for-rotator-cuff-repair
#27
COMPARATIVE STUDY
Matthias F Pietschmann, Valerie Froehlich, Andreas Ficklscherer, Bernd Wegener, Volkmar Jansson, Peter E Müller
Various suture anchors are available for rotator cuff repair. For arthroscopic application, a knotless anchor was developed to simplify the intra-operative handling. We compared the new knotless anchor (BIOKNOTLESStrade mark RC; DePuy Mitek, Raynham, MA) with established absorbable and titanium suture anchors (UltraSorbtrade mark and Super Revo 5mmtrade mark; ConMed Linvatec, Utica, NY). Each anchor was tested on 6 human cadaveric shoulders. The anchors were inserted into the greater tuberosity. An incremental cyclic loading was performed...
July 2008: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
https://read.qxmd.com/read/18237708/cyclic-load-testing-and-ultimate-failure-strength-of-biodegradable-glenoid-anchors
#28
COMPARATIVE STUDY
F Alan Barber, David A Coons, Michell Ruiz-Suarez
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare biodegradable glenoid suture anchors by cyclic loading and load to failure testing. METHODS: Seven different suture anchors (BioKnotless and Lupine Loop [DePuy-Mitek, Norwood, MA]; BioPushLock, BioSutureTak, and BioFasTak [Arthrex Corp, Naples, FL]; BioAnchor [Conmed Linvatec, Largo FL]; and BioRaptor [Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA]) were tested in 8 matched pairs of human cadaver fresh-frozen glenoids. The anchors were inserted in rotation into different glenoid rim positions...
February 2008: Arthroscopy
1
Fetch more papers »
Fetching more papers... Fetching...
Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"

We want to hear from doctors like you!

Take a second to answer a survey question.