keyword
https://read.qxmd.com/read/38649024/prevalence-characteristics-and-trends-in-retracted-spine-literature-2000-2023
#1
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Aman Singh, Mina Botros, Paul Guirguis, Ankit Punreddy, Addisu Mesfin, Varun Puvanesarajah
BACKGROUND: Retraction of scientific publications is an important check on scientific misconduct and serves to maintain the integrity of the scientific literature. The present study aims to examine the prevalence, trends, and characteristics of retracted spine literature across basic science and clinical spine literature. METHODS: Multiple databases were queried for retracted papers relating to spine or spine surgery, between January 2000 and May 2023. Of 112,668 publications initially identified, 125 were ultimately included in the present study following screening by two independent reviewers...
April 20, 2024: World Neurosurgery
https://read.qxmd.com/read/38628762/impostor-phenomenon-prevalence-among-1st-year-medical-students-and-strategies-for-mitigation
#2
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Algevis Wrench, Maria Padilla, Chasity O'Malley, Arkene Levy
Impostor phenomenon (IP) is described as a pattern typified by doubting one's accomplishments and a persistent fear of being exposed as a fraud. These feelings of self-doubt are pervasive along the medical education continuum, beginning with medical students where IP has been associated with emotional stress, physical exhaustion, depression, and anxiety. We, therefore, conducted an interactive workshop with first-year medical students to educate them about the manifesting patterns and risk factors of IP and strategies to mitigate these feelings...
April 30, 2024: Heliyon
https://read.qxmd.com/read/38390021/-the-different-models-of-scientific-journals
#3
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Jean-Philippe Chippaux
INTRODUCTION: Scientific journals are the main source of scientific data, ensuring their registration, validation, distribution and archiving. With over 2.6 million scientific articles published each year, the turnover of scientific journals exceeds $25 billion annually. Five publishers share nearly half of this lucrative market. Scientists are the key players in the process, but other stakeholders have gradually been introduced, building various business models whose similarities and differences are described here...
December 31, 2023: Med Trop Sante Int
https://read.qxmd.com/read/38382820/commentary-fifty-years-exploring-pharmacology-with-sam-enna
#4
REVIEW
Michael Williams
The passing of Sam Enna in June of 2023 is major loss to the world of pharmacology. While best known for his extensive research activities in the area of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pharmacology, Sam devoted much of his professional time to teaching and as an Editor in Chief for the legacy journals - the Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (JPET - 1998-2003); Pharmacology & Therapeutics (P & T - 2003-2023) and Biochemical Pharmacology (BCP -2003-2023) - increasing the volume of submissions for all three journals and their Impact Factors while decreasing the time for peer review and publication...
February 19, 2024: Biochemical Pharmacology
https://read.qxmd.com/read/38265048/the-definition-of-research-misconduct-should-be-stated-in-the-abstract-when-reporting-research-on-research-misconduct
#5
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Rafael Dal-Ré, Ana Marušić
Research integrity is the cornerstone for a reliable and trustworthy science. Research misconduct is classically defined as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism. To be considered as such, the action must have been committed with the intent to mislead or deceive. There are many other research misbehaviors such as duplication, fake-peer review or lack of disclosure of conflicts of interest, that are often included in the definition of research misconduct in codes, policies, and professional documents. The definition of research misconduct varies among countries and institutions, the seriousness and intentionality of the action...
January 24, 2024: Accountability in Research
https://read.qxmd.com/read/38246523/database-of-food-fraud-records-summary-of-data-from-1980-2022
#6
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Karen D Everstine, Henry B Chin, Fernando A Lopes, Jeffrey C Moore
Food fraud prevention and detection remains a challenging problem, despite recent developments in regulatory and auditing requirements. In 2012, the United States Pharmacopeial Convention created a database of food ingredient fraud. The objective of this research was to report on updates made to the database structure and to provide an updated analysis of food fraud records. The re-structured database was relational and included four tables: ingredients, adulterants, adulteration records, and references. Four adulteration record types were created to capture the variety of information that can be found in public food fraud reports...
January 19, 2024: Journal of Food Protection
https://read.qxmd.com/read/38193632/retraction-of-health-science-articles-by-researchers-in-latin-america-and-the-caribbean-a-scoping-review
#7
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Percy Herrera-Añazco, Daniel Fernandez-Guzman, Fernanda Barriga-Chambi, Jerry K Benites-Meza, Brenda Caira-Chuquineyra, Vicente Aleixandre Benites-Zapata
We aimed to conduct a scoping review to assess the profile of retracted health sciences articles authored by individuals affiliated with academic institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). We systematically searched seven databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Medline/Ovid, Scielo, and LILACS). We included articles published in peer-reviewed journals between 2003 and 2022 that had at least one author with an institutional affiliation in LAC. Data were collected on the year of publication, study design, authors' countries of origin, number of authors, subject matter of the manuscript, scientific journals of publication, retraction characteristics, and reasons for retraction...
January 9, 2024: Developing World Bioethics
https://read.qxmd.com/read/38036468/some-overseas-perspectives-regarding-periodicals
#8
EDITORIAL
Thomas W Elwood
Periodicals in the biomedical and natural sciences differ in fundamental ways, such as whether they use an impact factor. Peer review is considered another key element in scientific publications, but also can be viewed as having various flaws, e.g., poor in detecting fraud, highly subjective, prone to bias, expensive, and easily abused. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model in which reviewers know the identity of authors, but the reverse is not true, thereby raising a related concern that there is a serious power imbalance...
2023: Journal of Allied Health
https://read.qxmd.com/read/37725162/publication-retraction-in-spine-surgery-a-systematic-review
#9
REVIEW
Jordan J Levett, Lior M Elkaim, Naif M Alotaibi, Michael H Weber, Nicolas Dea, Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr
PURPOSE: The number of articles retracted by peer-reviewed journals has increased in recent years. This study systematically reviews retracted publications in the spine surgery literature. METHODS: A search of PubMed MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Retraction Watch, and the independent websites of 15 spine surgery-related journals from inception to September of 2022 was performed without language restrictions. PRISMA guidelines were followed with title/abstract screening, and full-text screening was conducted independently and in duplicate by two reviewers...
September 19, 2023: European Spine Journal
https://read.qxmd.com/read/37692206/analysis-of-retracted-manuscripts-in-chemistry-errors-vs-misconduct
#10
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Yulia Sevryugina, Ryan Jimenez
In this Viewpoint we discuss Chemistry manuscripts retracted during the 2001-2021 period (a total of 1292 journal articles retrieved from the Retraction Watch database). We showed that 58.5% of Chemistry manuscripts were retracted due to misconduct; of them, 40.5% of retractions were due to self-plagiarism and 36% due to fraud. Errors and concerns unrelated to misconduct constituted 26% of all retractions. Retracted manuscripts had a median retraction time of 1.7 years and peer-review time of 71 days (but only 43 days for fraudulent manuscripts)...
September 5, 2023: ACS Omega
https://read.qxmd.com/read/37498056/research-anomalies-in-criminology-how-serious-how-extensive-over-time-and-who-was-responsible
#11
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Walter R Schumm, Duane W Crawford, Lorenza Lockett, Abdullah AlRashed, Asma Bin Ateeq
A variety of ways to detect questionable research practices in small sample social science surveys have been discussed by a variety of authors. However, some of those approaches (e.g., GRIM test, SPRITE test) do not work well for results obtained from larger samples. Here several approaches for detecting anomalies in larger samples are presented and illustrated by an analysis of 78 journal articles in the area of criminology, 59 by Dr. Eric Stewart, published since 1998 with similar methods and/or authors. Of all 59 articles, 28 (47...
July 31, 2023: Accountability in Research
https://read.qxmd.com/read/37378894/post-publication-peer-review-with-an-intention-to-uncover-data-result-irregularities-and-potential-research-misconduct-in-scientific-research-vigilantism-or-volunteerism
#12
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Nicole Shu Ling Yeo-Teh, Bor Luen Tang
Irregularities in data/results of scientific research might be spotted pre-publication by co-workers and reviewers, or post-publication by readers typically with vested interest. The latter might consist of fellow researchers in the same subject area who would naturally pay closer attention to a published paper. However, it is increasingly apparent that there are readers who interrogate papers in detail with a primary intention to identify potential problems with the work. Here, we consider post-publication peer review (PPPR) by individuals, or groups of individuals, who perform PPPRs with a perceptible intention to actively identify irregularities in published data/results and to expose potential research fraud or misconduct, or intentional misconduct exposing (IME)-PPPR...
June 28, 2023: Science and Engineering Ethics
https://read.qxmd.com/read/37184087/integrity-of-randomized-clinical-trials-performance-of-integrity-tests-and-checklists-requires-assessment
#13
REVIEW
Khalid S Khan, Mohamed Fawzy, Patrick F W Chien
The integrity of randomized clinical trials (RCT) has become a concern owing to a recent rise in the number of retractions and the repercussions this has for evidence-based patient care. However, there is little research on the subject of RCT integrity assessment. Recent literature reviews have revealed that journals' authors' instructions concerning integrity and their investigation policies concerning allegations of misconduct are heterogeneous. The judicious use of integrity tests applied to RCT manuscripts is hampered by an absence of data concerning misconduct prevalence (pre-test probability), a failure to evaluate test performance (validity) and a lack of consensus over a gold standard (against which test accuracy can be evaluated)...
May 15, 2023: International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
https://read.qxmd.com/read/36466994/biased-wrong-and-counterfeited-evidences-published-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-a-systematic-review-of-retracted-covid-19-papers
#14
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Angelo Capodici, Aurelia Salussolia, Francesco Sanmarchi, Davide Gori, Davide Golinelli
In 2020 COVID-19 led to an unprecedented stream of papers being submitted to journals. Scientists and physicians all around the globe were in need for information about this new disease. In this climate, many articles were accepted after extremely fast peer-reviews to provide the scientific community with the latest discoveries and knowledge. Unfortunately, this also led to articles retraction due to authors' misconduct or errors in methodology and/or conclusions. The aim of this study is to investigate the number and characteristics of retracted papers, and to explore the main causes that led to retraction...
November 29, 2022: Quality & Quantity
https://read.qxmd.com/read/36093176/preventing-fraud-in-biomedical-research
#15
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Elie Cogan
Scientific fraud represents, to varying degrees, an increasingly important part of medical literature and is estimated to make up nearly 20% of this literature. The increase in the number of articles accessible in preprint without peer review during the COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increase in the accessibility of fraudulent articles. In recent years, the viral increase in the number of predatory journals has contributed to polluting the scientific literature with articles whose content is unverifiable. Given the international nature of biomedical research, there is an urgent need to define unequivocally what is considered scientific fraud...
2022: Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
https://read.qxmd.com/read/35918887/burnout-and-impostor-phenomenon-in-nursing-and-newly-licensed-registered-nurses-a-scoping-review
#16
REVIEW
Shermel Edwards-Maddox
AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence and severity of impostor phenomenon and burnout in newly licensed registered nurses, map the current literature on impostor phenomenon in nursing, and identify related factors affecting the new nurse's transition to practice. BACKGROUND: Impostor phenomenon is an internalised intellectual phoniness resulting in persistent self-doubt despite prior success. It can evoke feelings of emotional exhaustion associated with burnout, negatively affecting employee retention...
August 2, 2022: Journal of Clinical Nursing
https://read.qxmd.com/read/35850426/experts-identified-warning-signs-of-fraudulent-research-a-qualitative-study-to-inform-a-screening-tool
#17
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Lisa Parker, Stephanie Boughton, Rosa Lawrence, Lisa Bero
OBJECTIVE: Fraudulent research exists but can be difficult to spot. Made-up studies and results can affect systematic reviews and clinical guidelines, causing harm through incorrect treatments and practices. Our aim was to explore indicators of research fraud that could be included in a screening tool to identify potentially problematic studies warranting a closer scrutiny. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a qualitative international interview study, purposively recruiting participants with experience and/or expertise in research integrity, systematic reviews, biomedical publishing, or whistle-blowing research fraud...
July 16, 2022: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
https://read.qxmd.com/read/35669840/a-synthesis-of-the-formats-for-correcting-erroneous-and-fraudulent-academic-literature-and-associated-challenges
#18
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Jaime A Teixeira da Silva
Academic publishing is undergoing a highly transformative process, and many established rules and value systems that are in place, such as traditional peer review (TPR) and preprints, are facing unprecedented challenges, including as a result of post-publication peer review. The integrity and validity of the academic literature continue to rely naively on blind trust, while TPR and preprints continue to fail to effectively screen out errors, fraud, and misconduct. Imperfect TPR invariably results in imperfect papers that have passed through varying levels of rigor of screening and validation...
June 1, 2022: Journal for general philosophy of science, Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie
https://read.qxmd.com/read/35440932/healthcare-fraud-data-mining-methods-a-look-back-and-look-ahead
#19
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Nishamathi Kumaraswamy, Mia K Markey, Tahir Ekin, Jamie C Barner, Karen Rascati
Healthcare fraud is an expensive, white-collar crime in the United States, and it is not a victimless crime. Costs associated with fraud are passed on to the population in the form of increased premiums or serious harm to beneficiaries. There is an intense need for digital healthcare fraud detection systems to evolve in combating this societal threat. Due to the complex, heterogenic data systems and varied health models across the US, implementing digital advancements in healthcare is difficult. The end goal of healthcare fraud detection is to provide leads to the investigators that can then be inspected more closely with the possibility of recoupments, recoveries, or referrals to the appropriate authorities or agencies...
2022: Perspectives in Health Information Management
https://read.qxmd.com/read/34847169/detecting-fabrication-in-large-scale-molecular-omics-data
#20
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Michael S Bradshaw, Samuel H Payne
Fraud is a pervasive problem and can occur as fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, or theft. The scientific community is not exempt from this universal problem and several studies have recently been caught manipulating or fabricating data. Current measures to prevent and deter scientific misconduct come in the form of the peer-review process and on-site clinical trial auditors. As recent advances in high-throughput omics technologies have moved biology into the realm of big-data, fraud detection methods must be updated for sophisticated computational fraud...
2021: PloS One
keyword
keyword
80272
1
2
Fetch more papers »
Fetching more papers... Fetching...
Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"

We want to hear from doctors like you!

Take a second to answer a survey question.