keyword
MENU ▼
Read by QxMD icon Read
search

coflex

keyword
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/28324328/interspinous-implants-to-treat-spinal-stenosis
#1
REVIEW
Raj J Gala, Glenn S Russo, Peter G Whang
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lumbar spinal stenosis has historically been treated with open decompressive surgery which is associated with significant morbidity and may give rise to various complications. Interspinous spacers (ISS) have been developed as a less invasive strategy which may serve to avoid many of these risks. The two current spacers that are FDA approved and commercially available are the Coflex and Superion devices. The goal is to review these two implants, their indications, and patient selection...
March 21, 2017: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/28320256/internal-decompression-for-spinal-stenosis-idss-for-decompression-and-use-of-interlaminar-dynamic-device-coflextm-for-stabilization-in-the-surgical-management-of-degenerative-lumbar-canal-stenosis-with-or-without-mild-segmental-instability-our-initial-results
#2
Sumeet G Pawar, Arjun Dhar, Apurva Prasad, Satyashiva Munjal, P S Ramani
INTRODUCTION: Internal decompression of spinal stenosis (IDSS) and Posterior dynamic stabilization (PDS) form a bridge between decompression laminectomy alone and rigid fusion, by attempting to sustain beneficial effects of decompression and stabilization in an attempt to prevent bad effects of relentless degeneration. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcome in operated patient of posterior dynamic stabilization. DESIGN: Data were collected over 1 year in prospective, nonrandomized follow-up study using outcome scales...
March 21, 2017: Neurological Research
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/28254421/decompression-and-coflex-interlaminar-stabilisation-compared-with-conventional-surgical-procedures-for-lumbar-spinal-stenosis-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis
#3
REVIEW
Ai-Min Li, Xiang Li, Zhong Yang
BACKGROUND: Decompression plus spinal fusion is one of the most common surgeries for the treatment of degenerative spine disease in older adults. However, complications caused by fusion surgery have been reported in some studies. Recently published studies have reported that coflex is a safe and viable option in the selection of instrumentation for spinal stabilisation. Our meta-analysis was conducted to investigate whether decompression and coflex results in better performance for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients when compared with decompression and fusion surgery...
February 22, 2017: International Journal of Surgery
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/28241723/-efficacy-of-coflex-in-the-treatment-of-lumbar-spondylolisthesis
#4
Y Hai, X L Meng, D Y Li, X N Zhang, Y S Wang
Objective: To study the clinical results of Coflex and lumbar posterior decompression and fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis at L(4-5). Methods: Thirty-eight patients with Grade Ⅰ degenerative spondylolisthesis, from January 2008 to December 2011 in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University were reviewed, and patients were divided into two groups by randomness. Group A was treated with Coflex and group B with pedicle instrumentation and interbody fusion. Fifteen patients were included in group A, and 23 patients were included in group B...
March 1, 2017: Zhonghua Wai Ke za Zhi [Chinese Journal of Surgery]
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/27815024/evaluation-of-coflex-interspinous-stabilization-following-decompression-compared-with-decompression-and-posterior-lumbar-interbody-fusion-for-the-treatment-of-lumbar-degenerative-disease-a-minimum-5-year-follow-up-study
#5
Wei Yuan, Qing-Jun Su, Tie Liu, Jin-Cai Yang, Nan Kang, Li Guan, Yong Hai
Few studies have compared the clinical and radiological outcomes between Coflex interspinous stabilization and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for degenerative lumbar disease. We compared the at least 5-year clinical and radiological outcomes of Coflex stabilization and PLIF for lumbar degenerative disease. Eighty-seven consecutive patients with lumbar degenerative disease were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-two patients underwent decompression and Coflex interspinous stabilization (Coflex group), 45 patients underwent decompression and PLIF (PLIF group)...
January 2017: Journal of Clinical Neuroscience: Official Journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/27683714/a-novel-strategy-of-non-fusion-instrumentation-with-coflex-interlaminar-stabilization-after-decompression-for-lumbar-spinal-stenosis
#6
EDITORIAL
Hiroshi Nomura
No abstract text is available yet for this article.
2016: Journal of Spine Surgery (Hong Kong)
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/27403519/-using-a-new-implant-u-force-n6-to-level-l5-s1-to-avoid-lumbar-instability-after-single-discectomy
#7
I Arrotegui
INTRODUCTION: We conducted a retrospective study in patients with disc herniation and compared the results obtained in individuals treated with the U device N6 with those acquired in patients treated without any device. The U device is a titanium alloy implant that is placed between the spinous processes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a cohort of 50 patients with degenerative lumbar disc, 25 underwent surgical treatment in which the U device was placed and 25 control individuals were treated with discectomy alone...
November 2015: Acta Ortopédica Mexicana
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/27390709/the-cost-effectiveness-of-dynamic-and-static-interspinous-spacer-for-lumbar-spinal-stenosis-compared-with-laminectomy
#8
Mohsen Yaghoubi, Maziar Moradi-Lakeh, Mohammad Moradi-Joo, Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar, Neda Zamani, Ahmad Naghibzadeh-Tahami
BACKGROUND: The present study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Dynamic Interspinous Spacer (Coflex®) and Static Spacer (X-STOP ®) compared to Laminectomy (LAMI) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS: A decision-analysis model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness. The effectiveness parameters were obtained from a systematic literature review in relevant databases including PUBMED and EMBASE. A meta-analysis was performed using the STATA statistical package and a random model was used to collect measures of mean difference of visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score before and after intervention in X-stop, Coflex and LAMI (95% confidence intervals)...
2016: Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/27373477/-radiographic-study-of-coflex-interspinous-device-for-lumbar-spinal-stenosis
#9
A X Pan, Y Hai, J C Yang, X L Chen, W Yuan, H Guo
OBJECTIVE: To assess the radiography change of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) treated with the implantation of Coflex interspinous device retrospectively. METHODS: Sixty patients (34 male and 26 female) with LSS who underwent the decompression and Coflex device implanted surgery from January 2010 to December 2013 were followed up. The mean age of the patients was 59.4 years. There were 33 cases underwent Coflex surgery and 27 cases underwent Topping-off surgery. The Coflex segment ranged from L1/2 to L4/5 (L1-2: 1, L2-3: 5, L3-4: 19, L4-5: 35)...
July 1, 2016: Zhonghua Wai Ke za Zhi [Chinese Journal of Surgery]
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/27118374/interspinous-dynamic-stabilization-adjacent-to-fusion-versus-double-segment-fusion-for-treatment-of-lumbar-degenerative-disease-with-a-minimum-follow-up-of-three-years
#10
Xiao-Long Chen, Li Guan, Yu-Zeng Liu, Jin-Cai Yang, Wen-Long Wang, Yong Hai
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease treated with topping-off technique (Coflex(™) combined with fusion) and compare two-segment fusion at mid-long term follow-up; and find out whether the topping-off technique can reduce the rate of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after fusion. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-four consecutive patients who received topping-off surgery (76 patients) and two-segment fusion surgery (88 patients) from March 2009 to March 2012 were studied...
June 2016: International Orthopaedics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/27050538/three-year-follow-up-of-the-prospective-randomized-controlled-trial-of-coflex-interlaminar-stabilization-vs-instrumented-fusion-in-patients-with-lumbar-stenosis
#11
Hyun W Bae, Reginald J Davis, Carl Lauryssen, Scott Leary, Greg Maislin, Michael J Musacchio
BACKGROUND: Traditional surgical options for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis include decompression alone vs decompression and fusion; both options have potential limitations. OBJECTIVE: To report the 36-month follow-up analysis of the coflex Interlaminar Stabilization (Paradigm Spine, LLC, New York, New York) after decompression, examined under a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial, which is intended to provide stabilization after decompression while preserving normal segmental motion at the treated level...
August 2016: Neurosurgery
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/27021044/single-level-rigid-fixation-combined-with-coflex-a-biomechanical-study
#12
Wu Che, Qian Chen, Yi-Qun Ma, Yun-Qi Jiang, Wei Yuan, Xiao-Gang Zhou, Xi-Lei Li, Jian Dong
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this biomechanical in vitro study was to compare the kinematics and intradiscal pressure achieved with 2 methods: L4-L5 pedicle screw-rod fixation (PSRF) with an upper L3-L4 Coflex device and L4-L5 PSRF alone. The results were used to characterize the biomechanics of the topping-off operation with a Coflex device for the lumbar motion segment adjacent to single-level rigid fixation. MATERIAL/METHODS: Six human cadaveric spine specimens were biomechanically tested in vitro (6 males, 0 females)...
March 29, 2016: Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/26913226/evaluation-of-decompression-and-interlaminar-stabilization-compared-with-decompression-and-fusion-for-the-treatment-of-lumbar-spinal-stenosis-5-year-follow-up-of-a-prospective-randomized-controlled-trial
#13
Michael J Musacchio, Carl Lauryssen, Reginald J Davis, Hyun W Bae, John H Peloza, Richard D Guyer, Jack E Zigler, Donna D Ohnmeiss, Scott Leary
INTRODUCTION: If nonoperative treatment for lumbar stenosis fails, surgery may be considered. This traditionally includes decompression often combined with fusion. Desire for less extensive surgery led to developing new techniques and implants, including an interlaminar device designed with the goal of providing segmental stability without fusion, following decompression. The purpose of this study was to investigate 5-year outcomes associated with an interlaminar device. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted at 21 centers...
2016: International Journal of Spine Surgery
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/26529533/-optimization-of-segmental-lumbar-spine-instability-treatment-using-minimally-invasive-spinal-fusion-technique
#14
COMPARATIVE STUDY
V A Byvaltsev, A A Kalinin, E G Belykh, V A Sorokovikov, V V Shepelev
UNLABELLED: Open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using transpedicular rods and interbody cage, which is used to treat segmental instability, is associated with a significant paravertebral muscle and ligament injury. A new rigid fusion method was introduced to improve the outcome of patients' treatment. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of minimally invasive fusion technique and TLIF to improve the treatment results in patients with symptomatic lumbar spine degeneration concomitant with moderate segmental instability of the lumbar spine...
2015: Zhurnal Voprosy Neĭrokhirurgii Imeni N. N. Burdenko
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/26361324/paradoxical-radiographic-changes-of-coflex-interspinous-device-with-minimum-2-year-follow-up-in-lumbar-spinal-stenosis
#15
Nam Lee, Dong Ah Shin, Keung Nyun Kim, Do Heum Yoon, Yoon Ha, Hyun Chul Shin, Seong Yi
OBJECTIVES: Studies have yet to investigate long-term radiologic changes in lumbar spinal stenosis patients treated with interspinous device (Coflex). This study aimed to evaluate which radiologic parameters change significantly after surgery with Coflex and identify which parameter most affects the radiologic outcome. METHODS: Of 101 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated by Coflex insertion on L4-5, the radiologic parameters of 30 patients were measured before and at least 2 years after surgery...
January 2016: World Neurosurgery
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/26330954/a-systematic-review-of-interspinous-dynamic-stabilization
#16
REVIEW
Seon-Heui Lee, Aram Seol, Tae-Young Cho, Soo-Young Kim, Dong-Jun Kim, Hyung-Mook Lim
BACKGROUND: A systematic literature review of interspinous dynamic stabilization, including DIAM, Wallis, Coflex, and X-STOP, was conducted to assess its safety and efficacy. METHODS: The search was done in Korean and English, by using eight domestic databases which included KoreaMed and international databases, such as Ovid Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. A total of 306 articles were identified, but the animal studies, preclinical studies, and studies that reported the same results were excluded...
September 2015: Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/26291597/application-of-the-coflex-interlaminar-stabilization-in-patients-with-l5-s1-degenerative-diseases-minimum-4-year-follow-up
#17
Cong Xu, Fangmin Mao, Xiangyang Wang, Yan Lin, Huazi Xu
The Coflex is one of the representatives of posterior dynamic interspinous process device, but no study with the application of Coflex interlaminar stabilization in L5/S1 level has been performed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and validity of the Coflex interlaminar stabilization in the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases on L5/S1 level. A retrospective study was conducted for a consecutive series of 33 patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis or lumbar disc herniation located in L5/S1 between November 2007 and September 2010...
November 2016: American Journal of Therapeutics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/26187621/superior-outcomes-of-decompression-with-an-interlaminar-dynamic-device-versus-decompression-alone-in-patients-with-lumbar-spinal-stenosis-and-back-pain-a-cross-registry-study
#18
C Röder, B Baumgärtner, U Berlemann, E Aghayev
INTRODUCTION: Surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) has been associated with poorer outcomes in patients with pronounced low back pain (LBP) as compared to patients with predominant leg pain. This cross registry study assessed potential benefits of the interlaminar coflex® device as an add-on to bony decompression alone. METHODS: Patients with lumbar decompression plus coflex® (SWISSspine registry) were compared with decompressed controls (Spine Tango registry)...
October 2015: European Spine Journal
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/26161514/aseptic-intrafascial-and-extrafascial-abscesses-10-years-after-a-2-level-diam-insertion-procedure
#19
Ivan Stefanovic, Misa Radisavljevic, Dragan Stojanov
With the aim to prevent the so-called adjacent-segment disease in spinal fusion surgery and to serve as the primary surgical procedure for the management of low-back pain syndrome or neurogenic claudication in spinal stenosis, the so-called dynamic spine stabilization is applied using specifically designed implants: interspinous spacers, such as DIAM (Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion), Coflex, and X-stop. It is commonly accepted that interspinous spacers are made from material that is well tolerated by the body, that their placement is simple, that complications are rare, and that they can greatly benefit the patients...
July 10, 2015: Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/26131210/magnetic-resonance-imaging-on-disc-degeneration-changes-after-implantation-of-an-interspinous-spacer-and-fusion-of-the-adjacent-segment
#20
Xiaokang Liu, Yingjie Liu, Xiaofeng Lian, Jianguang Xu
The aim of the study was to investigate the changes of the lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after the implantation of interspinous device and the fusion of the adjacent segment. A total of 62 consecutive patients suffering L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation (LDH) with concomitant disc space narrowing or low-grade instability up to 5 mm translational slip in L5/S1 level were treated with lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) via posterior approach. Thirty-four of these patients (Coflex group) received an additional implantation of the interspinous spacer device (Coflex™) in the level L4/L5, while the rest of 28 patients (fusion group) underwent the fusion surgery alone...
2015: International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
keyword
keyword
58704
1
2
Fetch more papers »
Fetching more papers... Fetching...
Read by QxMD. Sign in or create an account to discover new knowledge that matter to you.
Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"