Mary E Rinella, Jeffrey V Lazarus, Vlad Ratziu, Sven M Francque, Arun J Sanyal, Fasiha Kanwal, Diana Romero, Manal F Abdelmalek, Quentin M Anstee, Juan Pablo Arab, Marco Arrese, Ramon Bataller, Ulrich Beuers, Jerome Boursier, Elisabetta Bugianesi, Christopher D Byrne, Graciela E Castro Narro, Abhijit Chowdhury, Helena Cortez-Pinto, Donna R Cryer, Kenneth Cusi, Mohamed El-Kassas, Samuel Klein, Wayne Eskridge, Jiangao Fan, Samer Gawrieh, Cynthia D Guy, Stephen A Harrison, Seung Up Kim, Bart G Koot, Marko Korenjak, Kris V Kowdley, Florence Lacaille, Rohit Loomba, Robert Mitchell-Thain, Timothy R Morgan, Elisabeth E Powell, Michael Roden, Manuel Romero-Gómez, Marcelo Silva, Shivaram Prasad Singh, Silvia C Sookoian, C Wendy Spearman, Dina Tiniakos, Luca Valenti, Miriam B Vos, Vincent Wai-Sun Wong, Stavra Xanthakos, Yusuf Yilmaz, Zobair Younossi, Ansley Hobbs, Marcela Villota-Rivas, Philip N Newsome
The principal limitations of the terms NAFLD and NASH are the reliance on exclusionary confounder terms and the use of potentially stigmatising language. This study set out to determine if content experts and patient advocates were in favor of a change in nomenclature and/or definition. A modified Delphi process was led by three large pan-national liver associations. The consensus was defined a priori as a supermajority (67%) vote. An independent committee of experts external to the nomenclature process made the final recommendation on the acronym and its diagnostic criteria...
December 1, 2023: Hepatology: Official Journal of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases