journal
MENU ▼
Read by QxMD icon Read
search

Scientometrics

journal
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29449753/do-younger-sleeping-beauties-prefer-a-technological-prince
#1
Anthony F J van Raan, Jos J Winnink
In this paper we investigate recent Sleeping Beauties cited in patents (SB-SNPRs). We find that the increasing trend of the relative number of SBs stopped around 1998. Moreover, we find that the time lag between the publication year of the SB-SNPRs and their first citation in a patent is becoming shorter in recent years. Our observations also suggest that, on average, in the more recent years SBs are awakened increasingly earlier by a 'technological prince' rather than by a 'scientific prince'. These observations suggest that SBs with technological importance are 'discovered' earlier in an application-oriented context...
2018: Scientometrics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29449752/capturing-r-d-excellence-indicators-international-statistics-and-innovative-universities
#2
Robert J W Tijssen, Jos J Winnink
Excellent research may contribute to successful science-based technological innovation. We define 'R&D excellence' in terms of scientific research that has contributed to the development of influential technologies, where 'excellence' refers to the top segment of a statistical distribution based on internationally comparative performance scores. Our measurements are derived from frequency counts of literature references ('citations') from patents to research publications during the last 15 years. The 'D' part in R&D is represented by the top 10% most highly cited 'excellent' patents worldwide...
2018: Scientometrics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29449751/betweenness-and-diversity-in-journal-citation-networks-as-measures-of-interdisciplinarity-a-tribute-to-eugene-garfield
#3
Loet Leydesdorff, Caroline S Wagner, Lutz Bornmann
Journals were central to Eugene Garfield's research interests. Among other things, journals are considered as units of analysis for bibliographic databases such as the Web of Science and Scopus. In addition to providing a basis for disciplinary classifications of journals, journal citation patterns span networks across boundaries to variable extents. Using betweenness centrality (BC) and diversity, we elaborate on the question of how to distinguish and rank journals in terms of interdisciplinarity. Interdisciplinarity, however, is difficult to operationalize in the absence of an operational definition of disciplines; the diversity of a unit of analysis is sample-dependent...
2018: Scientometrics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29449750/are-you-in-top-1-1%C3%A2
#4
Marek Kosmulski
A new simple bibliometric indicator is based on the number of highly cited papers (as defined by WoS ® ). It can be used to assess individuals, journals and universities. Unlike most other citation-based-indicators it equalizes the chances of young scientists (vs. their more experienced colleagues) and of scientists working in less-popular disciplines. The ranking of scientists based on the new indicator is not correlated with the rankings based upon the number of citations or on the Hirsch-index.
2018: Scientometrics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29449749/reference-publication-year-spectroscopy-rpys-of-eugene-garfield-s-publications
#5
Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild, Loet Leydesdorff
Which studies, theories, and ideas have influenced Eugene Garfield's scientific work? Recently, the method reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) has been introduced, which can be used to answer this and related questions. Since then, several studies have been published dealing with the historical roots of research fields and scientists. The program CRExplorer (http://www.crexplorer.net) was specifically developed for RPYS. In this study, we use this program to investigate the historical roots of Eugene Garfield's oeuvre...
2018: Scientometrics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29449748/visualizing-the-context-of-citations-referencing-papers-published-by-eugene-garfield-a-new-type-of-keyword-co-occurrence-analysis
#6
Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild, Sven E Hug
During Eugene Garfield's (EG's) lengthy career as information scientist, he published about 1500 papers. In this study, we use the impressive oeuvre of EG to introduce a new type of bibliometric networks: keyword co-occurrences networks based on the context of citations, which are referenced in a certain paper set (here: the papers published by EG). The citation context is defined by the words which are located around a specific citation. We retrieved the citation context from Microsoft Academic. To interpret and compare the results of the new network type, we generated two further networks: co-occurrence networks which are based on title and abstract keywords from (1) EG's papers and (2) the papers citing EG's publications...
2018: Scientometrics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29249842/mapping-the-growing-discipline-of-dissemination-and-implementation-science-in-health
#7
Wynne E Norton, Alina Lungeanu, David A Chambers, Noshir Contractor
Background: The field of dissemination and implementation (D&I) research in health has grown considerably in the past decade. Despite the potential for advancing the science, limited research has focused on mapping the field. Methods: We administered an online survey to individuals in the D&I field to assess participants' demographics and expertise, as well as engagement with journals and conferences, publications, and grants. A combined roster-nomination method was used to collect data on participants' advice networks and collaboration networks; participants' motivations for choosing collaborators was also assessed...
September 2017: Scientometrics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29200539/sequence-analysis-of-annually-normalized-citation-counts-an-empirical-analysis-based-on-the-characteristic-scores-and-scales-css-method
#8
Lutz Bornmann, Adam Y Ye, Fred Y Ye
In bibliometrics, only a few publications have focused on the citation histories of publications, where the citations for each citing year are assessed. In this study, therefore, annual categories of field- and time-normalized citation scores (based on the characteristic scores and scales method: 0 = poorly cited, 1 = fairly cited, 2 = remarkably cited, and 3 = outstandingly cited) are used to study the citation histories of papers. As our dataset, we used all articles published in 2000 and their annual citation scores until 2015...
2017: Scientometrics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29200538/using-google-scholar-institutional-level-data-to-evaluate-the-quality-of-university-research
#9
John Mingers, Jesse R O'Hanley, Musbaudeen Okunola
In recent years, the extent of formal research evaluation, at all levels from the individual to the multiversity has increased dramatically. At the institutional level, there are world university rankings based on an ad hoc combination of different indicators. There are also national exercises, such as those in the UK and Australia that evaluate research outputs and environment through peer review panels. These are extremely costly and time consuming. This paper evaluates the possibility of using Google Scholar (GS) institutional level data to evaluate university research in a relatively automatic way...
2017: Scientometrics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29081557/the-h-index-as-an-almost-exact-function-of-some-basic-statistics
#10
Lucio Bertoli-Barsotti, Tommaso Lando
As is known, the h-index, h, is an exact function of the citation pattern. At the same time, and more generally, it is recognized that h is "loosely" related to the values of some basic statistics, such as the number of publications and the number of citations. In the present study we introduce a formula that expresses the h-index as an almost-exact function of some (four) basic statistics. On the basis of an empirical study-in which we consider citation data obtained from two different lists of journals from two quite different scientific fields-we provide evidence that our ready-to-use formula is able to predict the h-index very accurately (at least for practical purposes)...
2017: Scientometrics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29081556/country-over-citation-ratios
#11
Victoria Bakare, Grant Lewison
There is a clear tendency for authors of scientific papers to over-cite the papers by their fellow countrymen (and countrywomen) relative to the percentage presence of their papers in world output in the same field. We investigated the Over-Citation Ratio (OCR) as a function of this percentage, and the effects of different scientific fields and publication years. For cancer research, we also compared clinical with basic research. We found that the OCR for a given percentage presence has been decreasing over the period 1980-2010, probably because of better communications...
2017: Scientometrics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29081555/research-collaboration-in-groups-and-networks-differences-across-academic-fields
#12
Svein Kyvik, Ingvild Reymert
The purpose of this paper is to give a macro-picture of collaboration in research groups and networks across all academic fields in Norwegian research universities, and to examine the relative importance of membership in groups and networks for individual publication output. To our knowledge, this is a new approach, which may provide valuable information on collaborative patterns in a particular national system, but of clear relevance to other national university systems. At the system level, conducting research in groups and networks are equally important, but there are large differences between academic fields...
2017: Scientometrics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29081554/network-structure-of-scientific-collaborations-between-china-and-the-eu-member-states
#13
Lili Wang, Xianwen Wang, Niels J Philipsen
Collaborations between China and the European Union (EU) member states involve not only connections between China and individual countries, but also interactions between the different EU member states, the latter of which is due also to the influence exerted by the EU's integration strategy. The complex linkages between China and the EU28, as well as among the 28 EU member states, are of great importance for studying knowledge flows. Using co-authorship analysis, this study explores the changes of the network structure between 2000 and 2014...
2017: Scientometrics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29081553/identifying-economics-place-amongst-academic-disciplines-a-science-or-a-social-science
#14
John Hudson
Different academic disciplines exhibit different styles, including styles in journal titles. Using data from the 2014 Research Excellence Framework (REF) in the UK we are able to identify the stylistic trends of different disciplines using 155,552 journal titles across all disciplines. Cluster analysis is then used to group the different disciplines together. The resulting identification fits the social sciences, the sciences and the arts and humanities reasonably well. Economics overall, fits best with philosophy, but the linkage is weak...
2017: Scientometrics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29056795/evaluating-alternative-systems-of-peer-review-a-large-scale-agent-based-modelling-approach-to-scientific-publication
#15
Michail Kovanis, Ludovic Trinquart, Philippe Ravaud, Raphaël Porcher
The debate on whether the peer-review system is in crisis has been heated recently. A variety of alternative systems have been proposed to improve the system and make it sustainable. However, we lack sufficient evidence and data related to these issues. Here we used a previously developed agent-based model of the scientific publication and peer-review system calibrated with empirical data to compare the efficiency of five alternative peer-review systems with the conventional system. We modelled two systems of immediate publication, with and without online reviews (crowdsourcing), a system with only one round of reviews and revisions allowed (re-review opt-out) and two review-sharing systems in which rejected manuscripts are resubmitted along with their past reviews to any other journal (portable) or to only those of the same publisher but of lower impact factor (cascade)...
2017: Scientometrics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29056794/duration-and-quality-of-the-peer-review-process-the-author-s-perspective
#16
Janine Huisman, Jeroen Smits
To gain insight into the duration and quality of the scientific peer review process, we analyzed data from 3500 review experiences submitted by authors to the SciRev.sc website. Aspects studied are duration of the first review round, total review duration, immediate rejection time, the number, quality, and difficulty of referee reports, the time it takes authors to revise and resubmit their manuscript, and overall quality of the experience. We find clear differences in these aspects between scientific fields, with Medicine, Public health, and Natural sciences showing the shortest durations and Mathematics and Computer sciences, Social sciences, Economics and Business, and Humanities the longest...
2017: Scientometrics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29056793/quantifying-the-effect-of-editor-author-relations-on-manuscript-handling-times
#17
Emre Sarigöl, David Garcia, Ingo Scholtes, Frank Schweitzer
In this article we study to what extent the academic peer review process is influenced by social relations between the authors of a manuscript and the editor handling the manuscript. Taking the open access journal PlosOne as a case study, our analysis is based on a data set of more than 100,000 articles published between 2007 and 2015. Using available data on handling editor, submission and acceptance time of manuscripts, we study the question whether co-authorship relations between authors and the handling editor affect the manuscript handling time, i...
2017: Scientometrics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29056792/the-miracle-of-peer-review-and-development-in-science-an-agent-based-model
#18
Simone Righi, Károly Takács
It is not easy to rationalize how peer review, as the current grassroots of science, can work based on voluntary contributions of reviewers. There is no rationale to write impartial and thorough evaluations. If reviewers are unmotivated to carefully select high quality contributions, there is no risk in submitting low-quality work by authors. As a result, scientists face a social dilemma: if everyone acts according to his or her own self-interest, the outcome is low scientific quality. We examine how the increased relevance of public good benefits (journal impact factor), the editorial policy of handling incoming reviews, and the acceptance decisions that take into account reputational information, can help the evolution of high-quality contributions from authors...
2017: Scientometrics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29056791/does-single-blind-peer-review-hinder-newcomers
#19
Marco Seeber, Alberto Bacchelli
Several fields of research are characterized by the coexistence of two different peer review modes to select quality contributions for scientific venues, namely double blind (DBR) and single blind (SBR) peer review. In the first, the identities of both authors and reviewers are not known to each other, whereas in the latter the authors' identities are visible since the start of the review process. The need to adopt either one of these modes has been object of scholarly debate, which has mostly focused on issues of fairness...
2017: Scientometrics
https://www.readbyqxmd.com/read/29056790/post-retraction-citations-in-context-a-case-study
#20
Judit Bar-Ilan, Gali Halevi
This study examines the nature of citations to articles that were retracted in 2014. Out of 987 retracted articles found in ScienceDirect, an Elsevier full text database, we selected all articles that received more than 10 citations between January 2015 and March 2016. Since the retraction year was known for only about 83% of the retracted articles, we chose to concentrate on recent citations, that for certain appeared after the cited paper was retracted. Overall, we analyzed 238 citing documents and identified the context of each citation as positive, negative or neutral...
2017: Scientometrics
journal
journal
27554
1
2
Fetch more papers »
Fetching more papers... Fetching...
Read by QxMD. Sign in or create an account to discover new knowledge that matter to you.
Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"