We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes in children: a meta-analysis.
Journal of Anesthesia 2016 Februrary
PURPOSE: Cuffed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) have increasingly been used in small children. However, the use of cuffed ETTs in small children is still controversial. The goal of this meta-analysis is to assess the current evidence regarding the postextubation morbidity and tracheal tube (TT) exchange rate of cuffed ETTs compared to uncuffed ETTs in children.
METHODS: A systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to November 2014 was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies that compared the use of cuffed and uncuffed ETTs in children. The primary outcome was the incidence of postextubation stridor and the second outcomes were the TT exchange rate, need for re-intubation, and duration of tracheal intubation. All pooled data were estimated using random effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS: Two RCTs and two prospective cohort studies including 3782 patients, in which 1979 patients for cuffed tubes and 1803 patients for uncuffed tubes, were included in our analysis. We found that the use of cuffed ETTs did not significantly increase the incidence of postextubation stridor (RR = 0.88; 95 % CI 0.67-1.16, p = 0.36), and the TT exchange rate was lower in patients receiving cuffed tubes intubation (RR, 0.07; 95 % CI 0.05-0.10, p < 0.00001). The need for re-intubation following planned extubations and duration of tracheal intubation did not differ significantly between the cuffed tube group and the uncuffed tube group.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that cuffed ETTs reduce the need for TT exchanges and do not increase the risk for postextubation stridor compared with uncuffed ETTs.
METHODS: A systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to November 2014 was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies that compared the use of cuffed and uncuffed ETTs in children. The primary outcome was the incidence of postextubation stridor and the second outcomes were the TT exchange rate, need for re-intubation, and duration of tracheal intubation. All pooled data were estimated using random effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS: Two RCTs and two prospective cohort studies including 3782 patients, in which 1979 patients for cuffed tubes and 1803 patients for uncuffed tubes, were included in our analysis. We found that the use of cuffed ETTs did not significantly increase the incidence of postextubation stridor (RR = 0.88; 95 % CI 0.67-1.16, p = 0.36), and the TT exchange rate was lower in patients receiving cuffed tubes intubation (RR, 0.07; 95 % CI 0.05-0.10, p < 0.00001). The need for re-intubation following planned extubations and duration of tracheal intubation did not differ significantly between the cuffed tube group and the uncuffed tube group.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that cuffed ETTs reduce the need for TT exchanges and do not increase the risk for postextubation stridor compared with uncuffed ETTs.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app